Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Todd, 877 So. 2d 143.

57 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Terance Roshell Dawson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Babineaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5 Cir. 1/13/04), writ denied, 04–583 (La.7/2/04), which in pertinent part stated: “In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.” Considering the evidence in a light most favora
State of Louisiana Versus C. T. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
7/2/04), State v. Gonzalez, 15-26 (La.
State v. Banks 241 So. 3d 1240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
7/2/04), State v. Perkins , 11-162 (La.App.
State ex rel. Roca v. State 237 So. 3d 501 La. 2018
5 Cir. 1/13/04), writs denied, (La.
State v. Doucet 237 So. 3d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
7/2/04), (this Court affirmed the defendant's convictions for aggravated rape and molestation of a juvenile despite the lack of medical evidence when the victim testified at trial that the defendant forced her to engage in various sexual acts, including the fondling of genitals, sexual intercourse, and oral copulation.)
State of Louisiana v. Dustin R. McGowan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 2/4/04), writ denied, 04-588 (La.7/2/04)
State v. McGowan 258 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Raye 230 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
7/2/04), ; Gonzalez, supra.
State v. Shokr 212 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
7/2/04); , this Court affirmed the defendant’s convictions for aggravated rape and molestation of a juvenile despite the lack of medical evidence when the victim testified at trial that the defendant forced her to engage in various sexual acts, including fondling of genitals, sexual intercourse and oral copulation.
State v. Hernandez 177 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
5 Cir. 1/13/04) ; -76 , writ denied, 04-0583 (La.7/2/04); , this Court affirmed the defendant’s convictions of aggravated rape and molestation of a juvenile despite the lack of medical evidence when the victim testified at trial that the defendant forced her to engage in various sexual acts, including the fondling of genitals, sexual intercourse, and oral copulation.
State v. Crucia 181 So. 3d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3d Cir.2/4/04), -42 , writ denied, 2004-0588 (La.7/2/04), (due to the lack of a contemporaneous objection, the defendant was precluded from appellate review regarding an allegedly defective chain of custody concerning the introduction of surveillance video tapes and seized cocaine).
State v. J.M. 189 So. 3d 1079 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
5 Cir. 1/13/04), , writ denied, 04-583 (La.7/2/04), .
State of Louisiana v. Anthony Daye La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Jimmie Breaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
7/2/04), (citations omitted), the fifth circuit noted: In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.
State v. Videau 131 So. 3d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 1/13/04) , , writ denied, 04-0583 (La.7/2/04), , the defendant argued on appeal that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction of aggravated rape, aggravated rape of a juvenile, oral sexual battery of a juvenile, and molestation of a juvenile upon multiple victims.
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Mitchell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
7/2/04), the defendant argued the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for distribution of a controlled dangerous substance because the trial court allowed the admission of drugs and a video tape of the drug transaction even though the chain of custody of the items was not properly established prior to thei
State v. Mitchell 125 So. 3d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/4/04) , , writ denied, 04-588 (La.7/2/04), , the defendant argued the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for distribution of a controlled dangerous substance because the trial court allowed the admission of drugs and a video tape of the drug transaction even though the chain of custody of the items was not properly established prior to their a
State v. Alfaro 128 So. 3d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
App. 5 Cir. 1/13/04), -76 , writ denied, 04-0583 (La.7/2/04), ,' this Court affirmed the defendant’s convictions of aggravated rape and molestation of a juvenile despite the lack of medical evidence |iawhen the victim testified at trial that the defendant forced her to engage in various sexual acts, including the fondling of genitals, sexual intercourse, and oral copulation.
State of Louisiana v. Thomas Kirk Gaton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 1/13/04), writ denied, 04-583 (La.7/2/04), which in pertinent part stated: ―In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness‘s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.‖ 11
State v. Lampkin 119 So. 3d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 1/13/04) , -76 , writ denied, 04-0583 (La.7/2/04), ; State v. Gaddis, 07-395 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Earl Steelman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
7/2/04), which stated: In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Earl Steelman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
7/2/04), : In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.
State v. Richoux 101 So. 3d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 1/13/04) , , writ denied, 04-0583 (La.7/2/04), , the defendant was convicted of aggravated rape of a juvenile.
State v. Pierce 80 So. 3d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 1/13/04) , , writ denied, 04-583 (La.7/2/04), , the defendant was convicted of aggravated rape, aggravated rape of a juvenile, oral sexual battery of a juvenile, and molestation of a juvenile, perpetrated upon two different victims.
State v. Friday 73 So. 3d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5th Cir.1/13/04), , writ denied, 2004-0583 (La.7/2/04), , the fifth circuit found a severance was not warranted where the defendant was charged with aggravated rape, aggravated rape of a juvenile, oral sexual battery of a | ¡.¡.juvenile, and molestation of a juvenile, which involved different victims (the defendant’s biological daughter and his girlfriend’s daughter).
State of Louisiana v. A. D. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. A.D.L. 64 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 1/13/04) , , writ denied, 04-583 (La.7/2/04), ).
State of Louisiana v. Jarman Gerard Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Jones 63 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/4/04) , , writ denied, 04-588 (La.7/2/04), .
State of Louisiana v. A.B.M., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
7/2/04), (citations omitted), the court stated: In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.
State v. A.B.M. 52 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 1/13/04) , , writ denied, 04-583 (La.7/2/04), (citations omitted), the court stated: In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.
State of Louisiana v. C. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
7/2/04), which in pertinent part stated: “In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.” Considering the evidence in a light most favorable to the pro
State v. C.S. 50 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 1/13/04) , , writ denied, 04-583 (La.7/2/04), , which in pertinent part stated: “In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.” Considering the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, suffic
State v. MERANTA 30 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
7/2/04), , the fifth circuit found a severance was not warranted where the defendant was charged with aggravated rape, aggravated rape of a juvenile, oral sexual battery of a juvenile, and molestation of a juvenile, which involved different victims, the defendant's biological daughter and his girlfriend's daughter.
State of Louisiana v. Eric Dainelle Montgomery La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
7/2/04), which stated: In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.
State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Joseph John La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
7/2/04), : In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.
State v. John 11 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
7/2/04), : In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness's testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.
State of Louisiana v. Lee Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
7/2/04), : In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.
State v. Vidrine 9 So. 3d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 1/13/04) , , writ denied, 04-583 (La.7/2/04), : In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.
State v. RD 997 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
7/2/04), , which stated that "in the absence of contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence .
State v. AUGUILLARD 997 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. R. D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
7/2/04), which stated that “in the absence of contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence .
State of Louisiana v. Russell J. Auguillard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. E. J. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
7/2/04), : In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.
State v. EJF 999 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 1/13/04) , , writ denied, 04-583 (La.7/2/04), : In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness's testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.
State v. E.J.F. 999 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 1/13/04) , , writ denied, 04-583 (La.7/2/04), : In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.
State of Louisiana v. Randall C. Curtis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
7/2/04), which stated: In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.
State v. Curtis 987 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 1/13/04) , , writ denied, 04-0583 (La.7/2/04), , which stated: In the absence of internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with physical evidence, one witness’s testimony, if believed by the trier of fact, is sufficient support for a requisite factual finding.
State v. Delaney 965 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
7/2/04), (citation omitted).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by