Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Holmes, 886 So. 2d 438.

48 citing documents.

Rafael Antonio Mena Chavez A/K/A Sergio Balboa, Individually and on Behalf of His Minor Children, Ingrid Mena Perez … La. 2024
11/8/04), (citing Horton v. McCary, 93-2315, p. 10 (La.
Sunni Jo Blanchard v. Tony Mancuso, Sheriff of Calcasieu Parish La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
The Lathan Company v. State of Louisiana, Department of Education, Recovery School District and John White in his … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
1118104), ( per curiam).
Wells Fargo Bank, Na v. Joseph L. Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Corp., 04-1592 (La.11/08/04), where the suit of a pro se plaintiff was dismissed for violating discovery orders] and [Horton v. McCary, 93-2315 (La.
Acadiana Renal Physicians, a Medical Corporation v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc., Lafayette General Medical … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Quentin Thomas Henry v. Greater Ouachita Water Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
George Keith Day v. Bnsf Railway Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
11/8/04), (per curiam); also see Adkins v. Wolever, 554 F.3d 650, 653 (6th Cir.2009).
In the Matter of the Succession of Yvonne Edna Morris La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Chris Carr, Jr. v. Geico Casualty Company and Shana Fairchild La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
11/8/04), -41 (per curiam).
Matthew M. Walker v. the Manitowoc Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Cf. Hutchinson v. Westport Insurance Corporation, 04- 1592 (La.11/8/04), (per curiam); also see Adkins v. Wolever, 554 F.3d 650, 653 (6th Cir.2009).
Walker v. Manitowoc Co. 259 So. 3d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/8/04), , 440 (per curiam); also see Adkins v. Wolever , 554 F.3d 650 , 653 (6th Cir.2009).
Graphic Packaging International, Inc. v. Lewis 187 So. 3d 499 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Corp., 2004-1592 (La.11/08/04), ; Wollerson v. Wollerson, 29,183 (La.App.2d Cir.1/22/97), .
BancorpSouth Bank v. Kleinpeter Trace, L.L.C. 155 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Hutchinson v. Westport Insurance Corporation, 04-1592 (La.11/8/04), ; Horton, 635 So.2d at 203 .
Natchitoches Parish Law Enforcement District v. Decimal, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Gauthier v. Harmony Construction, LLC 128 So. 3d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Corp., 04-1592 (La.11/8/04), ).
Natchitoches Parish Law Enforcement District v. Decimal, Inc. 124 So. 3d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Co., 04-1592 (La.11/8/04), .
Dufour v. Dow Chemical Co. 119 So. 3d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Corp., 04-1592 (La.11/8/04), .
Murungi v. Touro Infirmary 110 So. 3d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Corp., 04-1592, p. 2 (La.11/8/04), .
Johnson v. Bell 89 So. 3d 1200 La. 2012
Corp., 04-1592 (La.11/8/04), .
Johnson v. Bell 85 So. 3d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The defendants cited Hutchinson v. Westport Insurance Corp., 2004-1592 (La.11/8/04), , in support of their argument that the dismissal was warranted in this case due to Mr. Johnson’s willful failure to comply with numerous court orders compelling discovery.
Leah Lasseigne v. Gerald E. Landry, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Corp., 04-1592, p. 2 (La.11/8/04), (citations omitted).
Lasseigne v. Gerald E. Landry, L.L.C. 82 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Corp., 04-1592, p. 2 (La.11/8/04), (citations omitted).
Madeleine Bergeron v. Brian Bergeron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Bergeron v. Bergeron 75 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Corp., 04-1592 (La.11/8/04), .
Duffy v. Pendleton Memorial Methodist Hospital 53 So. 3d 636 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Corp., 2004-1592, p. 3 (La.2004), .
Mary Phyllis Soileau v. Smith's True Value and Rental D/B/A Just Ask Rental" " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Co., 04-1592, p. 2 (La.11/08/04)
Soileau v. SMITH'S TRUE VALUE AND RENTAL 40 So. 3d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 04-1592, p. 2 (La.11/08/04), .
Carroll v. SELECT MOTOR COMPANY, INC. 34 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
11/8/04), ; Coleman v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co., 01-1297 (La.App.
Darryrl C. Carroll, Sr. v. Select Motor Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
11/8/04), Coleman v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co., 01-1297 (La.App.
Britton v. HUSTMYRE 30 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
CANTUBA v. American Bureau of Shipping 31 So. 3d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In Hutchison v. Westport Insurance Corp., 2004-1592 (La.11/8/04), , the Supreme Court recognized that a trial court has much discretion in imposing sanctions on litigants for failure to comply with discovery orders, and noted, “Although dismissal is a harsh remedy, this case is deserving of a harsh remedy, as these tactics and delays frustrate the judicial system.” Id.
Blount Bros. Construction, Inc. v. Williams 26 So. 3d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Corp., 2004-1592 (La.11/08/04), ; L & M Hair Products, Inc. v. State, Dept. of Transp.
Johnson v. Gonzales 5 So. 3d 1062 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
11/8/04), , Lirette, 843 So.2d at 1142 .
At Your Service Enterprises, Inc. v. Swope 4 So. 3d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 2004-1592, p. 4 (La.11/8/04), .
Black v. Comfort 996 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Corp., 04-1592, p. 2 (La.11/8/04), .
Bravo v. Borden 975 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Wilson v. BROWN BROTHER 973 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Corp., 04-1592 (La.11/8/04), In the present action, as in the Hutchinson case, the plaintiff was unrepresented by counsel.
Claire Telezia Landry v. Phillip Larvin Comeaux, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
11/08/04), (citing Lirette v. Babin Farms, Inc., 02-1402 (La.App.
Landry v. Comeaux 971 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Co., 04-1592, p. 2 (La.11/08/04), ( citing Lirette v. Babin Farms, Inc., 02-1402 (La.App.
Raspanti v. Litchfield 946 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Corp., 04-1592, p. 2 (La.11/8/04), .
Shaunn Caillier McCorvey v. Derriel Carlton McCorvey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
11/08/04), where the suit of a pro se plaintiff was dismissed for violating discovery orders.
McCorvey v. McCorvey 922 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Corp., 04-1592 (La.11/08/04), , where the suit of a pro se plaintiff was dismissed for violating discovery orders.
Nicholas Rozas v. Keith Montero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
11/08/04), stating: The trial court has much discretion in imposing sanctions for failure to comply with discovery orders, and its ruling should not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.
Rozas v. Montero 916 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
The Louisiana Supreme Court also recently addressed this issue in Hutchinson v. Westport Insurance Co., 04-1592, p. 2 (La.11/08/04), , stating: The trial court has much discretion in imposing sanctions for failure to comply with discovery orders, and its ruling should not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.
Lane v. Kennan 901 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Corp., 04-1592 (La.11/8/04), .
Carliss Wayne Gordon, Sr. v. Sonic of Jennings, La La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
11/08/04), : The trial court has much discretion in imposing sanctions for failure to comply with discovery orders, and its ruling should not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.
Gordon v. Sonic of Jennings 893 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Co., 04-1592, p. 2 (La.11/08/04), , 440: The trial court has much discretion in imposing sanctions for failure to comply with discovery orders, and its ruling should not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.
Smith v. 4938 Prytania, Inc. 895 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Most recently, in Hutchinson v. Westport Insurance Corp., XXXX-XXXX (La.11/8/04), , the Supreme Court again found that dismissal was an appropriate remedy for a party's failure to comply with court ordered discovery.