DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Caillouet, 938 So. 2d 85.

18 citing documents.

  • Calvin W. Braxton, Sr. v. Louisiana State Troopers Association La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    10/6/06), Hatfield v. Herring, 54,048 (La.App.
  • Succession of Linda F. Enos La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    4 Cir. 6/14/06), writ denied 06-1732 (La.10/6/06), ( (La.App.
  • Succession of Loy L. Olsen, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
  • Wainwright v. Tyler 253 So. 3d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
  • William Johnson v. Jacob Colby Perry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    10/6/06), this court explained the plaintiff’s burden of proof for defamation in, stating: [T]o maintain an action for defamation, he has the burden of proving five elements: (1) defamatory words; (2) unprivileged publication; (3) falsity; (4) malice (actual or implied); and, (5) injury.
  • Nancy Cormier v. Jacob Colby Perry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    10/6/06), this court explained the plaintiff’s burden of proof for defamation, stating: [T]o maintain an action for defamation, he has the burden of proving five elements: (1) defamatory words; (2) unprivileged publication; (3) falsity; (4) malice (actual or implied); and, (5) injury.
  • Carolyn Louviere v. Jacob Colby Perry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    10/6/06), this court explained the plaintiff’s burden of proof for defamation1 in, stating: [T]to maintain an action for defamation, he has the burden of proving five elements: (1) defamatory words; (2) unprivileged publication; (3) falsity; (4) malice (actual or implied); and, (5) injury.
  • Robert E. Ahearn v. City of Alexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • Ahearn v. City of Alexandria 191 So. 3d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 4/12/06) , , writ denied, 06-1729 (La.10/6/06), .
  • Dina M. Bohn v. Kenneth Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    10/6/06), stating as follows: Article 971 was enacted by the legislature as a procedural device to be used in the early stages of litigation to screen out meritless claims brought primarily to chill the valid exercise of the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and petition for redress of grieva
  • Bohn v. Miller 189 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 4/12/06), , writ denied, 06-1729 (La.10/6/06), , stating as follows: Article 971 was enacted by the legislature as a procedural device to be used in the early stages of litigation to screen out meritless claims brought primarily to chill the valid exercise of the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and petition for redress of grievances.
  • Succession of Carroll 72 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    3d Cir.4/12/06), , writ denied, 2006-1729 (La.10/6/06), .
  • Judy Lyons v. Ann Knight La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 4/12/06), writ denied, 06-1729 (La.10/6/06)
  • Lyons v. Knight 65 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 4/12/06), , writ denied, 06-1729 (La.10/6/06), .
  • Britton v. HUSTMYRE 30 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Gwandiku v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. 972 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 4/12/06), , writ denied, 06-1729 (La.10/6/06), ; Thomas v. City of Monroe Louisiana, 36,526 (La.App.
  • Dr. Stella Gwandiku v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    10/6/06), Thomas v. City of Monroe Louisiana, 36,526 (La.App.
  • Thinkstream, Inc. v. Rubin 971 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    3rd Cir.4/12/06), , writ denied, 06-1729 (La.10/6/06), .