Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Morgan, 59 So. 3d 403.

39 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Keyhaid J. McGee La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
3/15/11), -09 (quoting State v. Benjamin, 97-3065, p. 3 (La.
State of Louisiana v. K.B. La. 2025
3/15/11), Not all police-citizen encounters are “seizures.” Terry, 392 U.S. at 19 n.16, 88 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Jamarkus Ardoin La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
3/15/11), (citation omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Zachary Hunt La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Damien J. Debose La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 4/9/14), ) (citing State v. Morgan, 2009-2352, p. 4 (La.3/15/11), ).
State of Louisiana v. Terry E. McCall La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Thomas Riles La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Roosevelt T. Ardison La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Aaron Maurice Young La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Bell-Brayboy La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
3/15/11), State v. Ardison, 52,739 (La.
State v. Newsome 273 So. 3d 305 La. 2019
State v. Dorsey 260 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Adrian A. Dorsey A/K/A Adrian Anton Dorsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. McMasters 251 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3/15/11), , 406 ("Furthermore, a reviewing court must give due weight to factual inferences drawn by resident judges.").
State v. Purvis 217 So. 3d 620 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Barnes 203 So. 3d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Lewis 187 So. 3d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
“Although reasonable suspicion is a less demanding standard than probable cause, the Fourth Amendment requires some minimal level of objective justification for making the stop.” State v. Morgan, 09-2352, p. 4 (La.3/15/11), (citing United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 , 109 S.Ct.
State v. King 184 So. 3d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
As noted by the Louisiana Supreme, Court in State v. Morgan, 2009-2352, p. 4 (La.3/15/11), , 406: “Although reasonable suspicion is a less demanding standard than probable.cause, the Fourth Amendment requires some minimal level of objective justification for making the stop.
State v. Jones 165 So. 3d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See also State v. Morgan, 09-2352, p. 5 (La.3/15/11), (“Furthermore, a reviewing court must give due weight to factual inferences drawn by resident judges....
State v. Boyles 157 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
As noted by the Court in State v. Morgan, 2009-2352, p. 4 (La.3/15/11), , 406: “Although reasonable suspicion is a less demanding standard than probable cause, the Fourth Amendment requires some minimal level of objective justification for making the stop.
State v. Gayton 156 So. 3d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See also State v. Morgan, 092352, p. 5 (La.3/15/11); (“Furthermore, a reviewing court must give due weight to factual inferences drawn by resident judges....
State v. Robertson 168 So. 3d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Morgan, 09-2352 (La.3/15/11), .
State ex rel. J.W. 157 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 4/9/14), (quoting State v. Morgan, 09-2352, p. 6 (La.3/15/11), ).
State v. Greenberry 141 So. 3d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Thus, for example, “flight, nervousness, or a startled look at the sight of a police officer” are types of conduct that “may be highly suspicious” and may support “a finding of reasonable cause.” State v. Morgan, 09-2352, p. 8 (La.3/15/11), .
State v. Robertson 136 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
|/The Louisiana Supreme Court has indicated that while “flight, nervousness, or a startled look at the sight of a police officer is, by itself, insufficient to justify an investigatory stop,” “this type of conduct may be highly suspicious and, therefore, may be one of the factors leading to a finding of reasonable cause.” State v. Morgan, 09-2352, p. 8 (La.3/15/11), .
State v. McClendon 133 So. 3d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See also State v. Morgan, 09-2352, p. 5 (La.3/5/11), (“Furthermore, a reviewing court must give due weight to factual inferences drawn by resident judges.”).
State v. Jones 128 So. 3d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Morgan, 09-2352, p. 8 (La.3/15/11), .
State ex rel. D.F. 122 So. 3d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Morgan, 2009-2352, p. 4 (La.3/15/11), .
State v. Cureaux 116 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
As noted by the Court in State v. Morgan, 2009-2352, p. 4 (La.3/15/11), , 406: “[a]lthough reasonable suspicion is a less demanding standard than probable cause, the Fourth Amendment requires some minimal level of objective justification for making the stop.
State v. Reed 107 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Evasive behavior, although not necessarily indicative of wrongdoing, is certainly suggestive of such and, accordingly, is a “pertinent factor in determining reasonable suspicion.” State v. Morgan, 09-2352, p. 5 (La.3/15/11), (citing U.S. v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873, 885 , 95 S.Ct.
State v. Foster 108 So. 3d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Morgan, 09-2352, p. 5 (La.3/15/11), ; Denson , 11-0517, p. 5, 83 So.3d at 1187
State v. Gibson 103 So. 3d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Morgan, 09-2352 (La.3/15/11), .
State v. Brown 105 So. 3d 734 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
1581 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989), citing Terry v. Ohio, supra; State v. Morgan, 2009-2352 (La.3/15/11), .
State v. Sierra 83 So. 3d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Morgan, 09-2352, (La.3/15/11), .
State v. Leonard 80 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Morgan, 09-2352, p. 4 (La.3/15/11), -06 .
State Ex Rel. Dm 80 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 1/10/07), (reversed on other grounds); see also State v. Morgan, 09-2352 p. 8 (La.3/15/11), ("Although flight ...
State ex rel. of D.M. 80 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 1/10/07), (reversed on other grounds); see also State v. Morgan, 09-2852 p. 8 (La.3/15/11), (“Although flight ...
State v. Martin 79 So. 3d 951 La. 2011
1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Morgan, 2009-2352, p. 6 (La.3/15/11); -408 .
State v. Williams 74 So. 3d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“Although reasonable suspicion is a less demanding standard than probable cause, the Fourth Amendment requires some minimal level of objective justification for making the stop.” State v. Morgan, 09-2352, p. 4 (La.3/15/11), (citing United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 , 109 S.Ct.