Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Petitto, 59 So. 3d 1245.

19 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Reginald Ruffins La. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Ryan Chapman Writ Granted; Judgment Reversed; Remanded. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
3/15/11), State v. Perez, 464 So.
State of Louisiana v. Donald Alan Crooks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3/15/11), (emphasis in original) the supreme court discussed the element of intent as required for a conviction for malfeasance in office: Louisiana R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Lance Morrow La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Explained Jacob Johnson v. Daryl Purpera, Individually And In His Official Capacity As Louisiana Legislative Auditor, State Of Louisiana, … La. 2021
3/15/11), the statute requires that the act or failure to act must be intentional on the part of the public officer or employee.
Jacob Johnson v. Daryl Purpera, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Louisiana Legislative Auditor, State of Louisiana, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Brian L. Pope La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. William Thomas Jones, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State v. Ferguson 274 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Alexcee 262 So. 3d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Ballard 239 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Leslie C. Thompson La. 2017
3/15/11), (emphasis in original).
State v. Marchiafava 226 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Ferguson 176 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
art. 532(1) — “can be analogized to an exception of no cause of action in the civil arena.” State v. Petitto, 10-0581, p. 4 (La.3/15/11), .
State v. Thompson 163 So. 3d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
As noted by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Petitto, 10-0581 (La.3/15/11), (emphasis in original): The object of the malfeasance statute is to punish a breach of duty committed with the required culpable state of mind.
AAA Safety, Inc. v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 146 So. 3d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Petitto, 10-0581 (La.3/15/11), .
State v. Petitto 116 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Whether the Code of Governmental Ethics can form the basis for a criminal charge of malfeasance in office under Louisiana Revised Statute 14:134 was answered in the affirmative by the Louisiana Supreme Court in the related matter State v. Petitto, 10-0581 (La.3/15/11), .
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Newton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3/15/11), the court explained the applicable law regarding interpretation of a statute, stating in pertinent part: For that reason, “where the words of a statute are clear and free from ambiguity, they are not to be ignored under the pretext of pursuing their spirit.”
State v. Newton 129 So. 3d 11 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In State v. Petitto, 10-581, pp. 6-7 (La.3/15/11), , the court explained the applicable law regarding interpretation of a statute, stating in pertinent part: For that reason, “where the words of a statute are clear and free from ambiguity, they are not to be ignored under the pretext of pursuing their spirit.” Se

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by