No. 2011 CA 0827
Precedential
Processed
Matherne v. Barnum
Matherne v. Barnum, 94 So. 3d 782 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012).
Cited by
- Matthew and Jessica Organ v. Carlos J. Juarez individually and Carlos J. Juarez d_b_a … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
- Robin Caronna and Joshua Caronna, Sr. v. Outdoor Living, LLC and/or Outdoor Living Pools, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
- Laurie Mosher wife of/and Gordon Mosher v. Wilserv Corporation and ABC Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
- Michael Leblanc and Jill Leblanc v. Michael E. Powers Construction, Inc. and XYZ Insurance … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
- Mathes Brierre Architects, a Professional Corporation v. karlton/isg Enterprises, LLC, International Sales Group, LLC, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
- Kelly McHugh and Associates, Inc. v. RPDE Development, LLC, David W. Johnson, Phillip G. … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
- SBL Construction, LLC v. Michael M. Eymard and Tram Investments, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- Hoskins v. State Through Division of Administration , Office of Community Development 273 So. 3d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
- Sherri Transier v. Barnes Building, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
- Transier v. Barnes Building, LLC 166 So. 3d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- Hohensee v. Turner 216 So. 3d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- Michael O. Read v. Willwoods Community 165 So. 3d 883 La. 2015
Opinion text
CARTER, C.J., dissents in part. | ,In my opinion, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the Math-ernes $25,000.00 in non-pecuniary damages, and therefore, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s amendment of the judgment to reduce the award of non-pecuniary damages to $5,000.00. In all other respects, I agree with the conclusions reached by the majority.