DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 94 So. 3d 750.

183 citing documents.

  • Hooper v. Hero Lands Co. 216 So. 3d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    6 “A genuine issue of material fact is one as to which reasonable persons could disagree; if reasonable persons could reach only one conclusion, there is no need for trial on that issue and summary judgment is appropriate.” Phipps , 14-0672, p. 19, 163 So.3d at 224 (quoting Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 8 (La.7/2/12), ).
  • Wanda Kahl v. Tricky Chevalier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • Kahl v. Chevalier 188 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    pp. 3 Cir. 12/10/14), -78 ), this court revisited the law relative to summary judgment to explain recent legislative changes: “Appellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Virgil McCoy v. Town of Rosepine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • McCoy v. Town of Rosepine 187 So. 3d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    “Appellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Thomas Nearhood v. Fitness Partners of Pineville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • Meyers & Associates, Inc. v. the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    7/2/12), ―[a]ppellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court‘s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.‖ The prohibition against the trial court considering anything other than the evidence admitted for the pu
  • Meyer & Associates, Inc. v. Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana 185 So. 3d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    As noted in Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc.; 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), , “[ajppellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” The prohibition against the trial court considering anything .other than the evidence admitted for the purpose of
  • Lucien v. Dupree 185 So. 3d 107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    See Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 2011-2566 (La.07/02/12), .
  • Reese S. Martin v. Steve Delia & Associates, Ltd. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • Martin v. Steve Delia & Associates, Ltd. 181 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    “Appellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Summer Hunter v. Lafayette Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    7/2/12), : A fact is material if it potentially insures or precludes recovery, affects a litigant’s ultimate success, or determines the outcome of the legal dispute.
  • Hunter v. Lafayette Consolidated Government 177 So. 3d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    As our supreme court explained in Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, pp. 7-8 (La.7/2/12), , 755: A fact is material if it potentially insures or precludes recovery, affects a litigant’s ultimate success, or determines the outcome of the legal dispute.
  • Garred Whotte v. International Paper Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • Surcouf v. Darling 177 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See e.g., Mooring Tax Asset Group, L.L.C., 14-0109, p. 5, 156 So.3d at 1147 (“The sale of property for nonpayment of taxes is an action that affects a property right protected by the Fourteenth Amendment”); Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, pp. 8-9 (La.7/2/12), (same); Brookewood Investments Co., L.L.C. v. Sixty-Three Twenty-Four Chef Menteur Highway, L.L.C., 12-1205, p. 6-7 (La.App.
  • Whotte v. International Paper Co. 177 So. 3d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Detillier v. Borne 176 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Mills v. Cyntreniks Plaza, L.L.C. 182 So. 3d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • Tony Berard, Et Ux. v. the Lemoine Company, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • Berard v. Lemoine Co., LLC 169 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Smit *841 ko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Todd Morein, Et Ux. v. Acme Land Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    “Appellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12)
  • Morein v. Acme Land Co. 166 So. 3d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 5/7/14) , [ ], “Appellate review of the granting of a motion for *1234 summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Rain & Hail, L.L.C. v. Davis 165 So. 3d 1204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566 (La.07/02/12), ; Monroe Surgical Hospital, LLC v. St.
  • Paris Madison v. State of La, Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 2011-2566 (La.7/2/12)
  • Madison v. State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections 164 So. 3d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 2011-2566 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Quantum Resources Management, L.L.C. v. Pirate Lake Oil Corp. 170 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566 (La.7/02/12), .
  • Brett Owen Bourque v. Transit Mix Concrete & Materials Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • Bourque v. Transit Mix/Trinity Ind. 162 So. 3d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    It is well settled that “[ajppellate review of the granting of a motion for súmmary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Phipps v. Schupp 163 So. 3d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    “A genuine issue of material fact is one as to which reasonable persons could disagree; if reasonable persons could reach only one conclusion, there is no need for trial on that issue and summary judgment is appropriate.” Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 8 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Vincent Charles Bundrick v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • James Duplantis, Et Ux. v. Victor Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • Bundrick v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. 159 So. 3d 1137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    OPINION It is well settled that “[a]ppellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Duplantis v. Miller 159 So. 3d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Cropprue Rental Properties, LLC v. Michael 162 So. 3d 645 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Const, art. VII, § 25(A)(1); Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 2011-2566 (La.07/02/12), .
  • Arceneaux v. Amstar Corp. 161 So. 3d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 2011-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Amy Tepper v. Red River Academy, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, pp. 7-8 (La.7/2/12)
  • Swift Energy Operating, LLC v. Plemco-South, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    7/2/12), “[a]ppellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” 8 Additio
  • Kacey Ryder v. Dr. Gary Manuel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • Tepper v. Red River Academy, L.L.C. 157 So. 3d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, pp. 7-8 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Swift Energy Operating, L.L.C. v. Plemco-South, Inc. 157 So. 3d 1154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    As noted in Smitko *1161 v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), , “[a]ppellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” Additionally, although amended multiple times in the last three years, 8 summary judgment proceedings are still f
  • Mary Elberson v. Geico General Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, pp. 7-8 (La.7/2/12)
  • Lakeisha Waterstraat v. Vernon Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • Custer v. Gala Investments, L.L.C. 167 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Const. art. VII, § 25(A)(1); Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Ricky J. Matte v. Robert Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • Matte v. Brown 154 So. 3d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    “Appellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Mooring Tax Asset Group, L.L.C. v. Roderick A. James and the United States Department of Treasury-Internal Revenue Service 156 So. 3d 1143 La. 2014
    7/2/12), Lewis v. Succession of Johnson, 05-1192 (La.
  • Leonard Blackwell v. Waste Management of Louisiana, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • Blackwell v. Waste Management of Louisiana, LLC 150 So. 3d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    OPINION It is well-settled that “[ajppellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), .
  • Terry Lee Johnson, Sr. v. Lynn Edward Foret, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • Johnson v. Foret 146 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc., 93-2512 (La.7/5/94), ; Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566 (La.7/2/12), .