Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 94 So. 3d 750.

183 citing documents.

Nicholas Williams v. Usagencies Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
7/2/12), (citations omitted).
Williams v. USAgencies Casualty Ins. Co. 140 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
It is well-settled that “[ajppellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), (citations omitted).
Square v. Hampton 144 So. 3d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), .
Brett Owen Bourque v. Transit Mix Concrete & Materials Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Doris Bell v. Dolgencorp, LLC D/B/A Dollar General Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
7/2/12), (citations omitted).
Bourque v. Transit Mix 161 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
It is well-settled that “[ajppellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), .
Susan Arnaud, Et Ux. v. Ronald Dies La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-1566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), - 83.
Arnaud v. Dies 153 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-1566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), ; Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), -83 .
Shirley Elaine Foster Hooper v. Jack L. Hodnett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
7/2/12), (citations omitted).
Linda Jeane Garman, Et Vir. v. Joyce Jeane Serhan, Et Vir. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
7/2/12), (citations omitted).
Hooper v. Hodnett 153 So. 3d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
It is well-settled that “[ajppellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), (citations omitted).
Garman v. Serhan 153 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
It is well-settled that “[ajppellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), (citations omitted).
Succession of Holbrook 144 So. 3d 845 La. 2014
Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), ; Bonin v. Westport Ins.
Jackson v. City of New Orleans 144 So. 3d 876 La. 2014
Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 2011-2566 (La.7/2/12), .
First Bank & Trust v. Redman Gaming of Louisiana, Inc. 131 So. 3d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566 (La.7/2/12); .
Levier, LLC v. Yolander Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
7/2/12), (footnote omitted).
Levier, LLC v. Thomas 127 So. 3d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, pp. 8-9 (La.7/2/12), (footnote omitted).
Mooring Tax Asset Group, L.L.C. v. James 129 So. 3d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The matter was remanded for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s holding in Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 2011-2566 (La.7/2/12), .
Auta B. Highsmith, Et Ux v. Lynn Edward Foret, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Pignona v. Farber 128 So. 3d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 2011-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), .
Hunt v. Golden Corral Corp. 116 So. 3d 1035 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, pp. 7-8 (La.7/2/12), .
Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc. 120 So. 3d 678 La. 2013
In Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 2011-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12); , we stated “[a]ppellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” A motion for summary judgment “shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to in
Pociask v. Moseley 122 So. 3d 533 La. 2013
Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-1566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12), ; Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/08), -83 .
Melissa B. Dugas v. Officer Larry Theriot, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Melissa B. Dugas v. Officer Larry Theriot, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Brookewood Investments Co. v. Sixty-Three Twenty-Four Chef Menteur Highway L.L.C. 116 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 1/16/13) , , in light of its holding in Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2556 (La.7/2/12), .
Brookewood Investments Co. v. Sixty-Three Twenty-Four Chef Menteur Highway L.L.C. 110 So. 3d 134 La. 2013
Case remanded to the court of appeal for reconsideration in light of Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566 (La.7/2/12), .
Quantum Resources Management, L.L.C. v. Pirate Lake Oil Corp. 112 So. 3d 209 La. 2013
Smitko v. Gulf S. Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 14 (La.7/2/12); .
Sherman Journet v. Clifford Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 8 (La.7/2/12)
Journet v. Mouton 107 So. 3d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566, p. 8 (La.7/2/12), .
State v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co. 110 So. 3d 1038 La. 2013
As we recently stated in Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 2011-2566, p. 7 (La.7/2/12); , “[a]ppellate review of the granting of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, using the identical criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.” A motion for summary judgment “shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogator
Cititax Group, L.L.C. v. Gibert 108 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 2011-2566, p. 11 (La.7/2/12), .
Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. Webeland, Inc. 98 So. 3d 823 La. 2012
See Smitko v. Gulf South Shrimp, Inc., 11-2566 (La.7/2/12), ; Sutter v. Dane Investments, Inc., 07-1268 (La.App.