State ex rel. Jackson v. State
State ex rel. Jackson v. State, 90 So. 3d 384 (La. 2012).
Cited by
- State of Louisiana Versus Perry J. Haydel, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
- State Of Louisiana v. Justin Lee Warner La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
- State of Louisiana Versus Walter Dj Thomas La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
- State v. Saulny 220 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- State v. Durr 202 So. 3d 996 La. 2016
- State v. Fairman 173 So. 3d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- State v. Jones 165 So. 3d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- State v. Lewis 169 So. 3d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- State v. Williams 151 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- State v. Hager 148 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- State v. Debrow 138 So. 3d 1229 La. 2014
- State v. Abdul 131 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Stokes 56 So. 3d 1008
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. | Writ granted. Following a rape conviction in which the state’s case rested largely on the victim’s identification and in which relator presented a defense of mis-identification at trial, the lower courts erred when they denied the application for post conviction DNA testing based on the alleged failure of the testing to establish relator’s innocence. La. Code Crim. Proc. art. 926.1(B) and (C). The district court is therefore directed to investigate the availability and integrity of the untested evidence and to order DNA testing in the event that it determines the results could tend to make relator’s guilt more or less probable. La.Code Crim. Proc. art. 926.1(C) and (D). See e.g., State v. Stokes, 10-1387 (La.2/11/11), 56 So.3d 1008 . VICTORY and CLARK, JJ„ would deny. WEIMER, J., recused.