DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hargrave v. State, 100 So. 3d 786.

14 citing documents.

  • Raven Gotte, Jr. v. Air Conduit, LLC and Amerisure Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    10/16/12), found and states that there does not exist a per se conflict of interest as to this issue.
  • Overruled Angela Leonards v. Carmichael's Cashway Pharmacy, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
  • Sonic Ambassador v. Richard 270 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    10/16/12), , because there was no dispute concerning the quality or nature of the services in question of the vocational counselor, Ms. Brantley could not be required to abide by the conditions set forth in the contract presented to her by Mr. Richard.
  • Sonic of Ambassador v. Damon Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    10/16/12), because there was no dispute concerning the quality or nature of the services in question of the vocational counselor, Ms. Brantley could not be required to abide by the conditions set forth in the contract presented to her by Mr. Richard.
  • Ronald Nero v. Allied Waste Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • Nero v. Allied Waste Servs. 265 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    10/16/12), , reviewed a decision of this court that again endorsed these conditions.
  • Baker v. Harrah's 190 So. 3d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    11sThe Louisiana Supreme Court, .addressing the Crain Brothers conditions, held in Hargrave v. State, 2012-0341, p. 13 (La.10/16/12), , 793: Accordingly, we conclude the hearing officer manifestly erred in determining that the conditions set forth in the letter agreement were reasonable or necessary.
  • Ellis Hargrave v. Elier Diaz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • Hargrave v. Diaz 178 So. 3d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    ’ , Hargrave v. State, 12-0341, p. 13-14 (La.10/16/12), .
  • Glenn M. Hebert v. Louisiana Licensed Professional Vocational Rehabilitations Counselors Board of Examiners La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    10/16/12), have since addressed the issue of 2 hearing, which took place on January 6, 2005.
  • Juan Carlos Allen v. Affordable Home Furnishings La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    10/16/12), Allen seems to be arguing that the conditions are a reasonable response to the history of sham rehabilitation cases in the past.
  • Allen v. Affordable Home Furnishings 149 So. 3d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    As in Hargrave v. State, 12-341 (La.10/16/12), , Allen seems to be arguing that the conditions are a reasonable response to the history of sham rehabilitation cases in the past.
  • Shanelle Chapman v. Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    10/16/12), (wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court rejected a court’s requirement that a vocational rehabilitation counselor comply with certain prophylactic claimant-requested conditions absent evidence as to an actual dispute regarding the quality of the services provided by the counselor or the necessity of such services.)3
  • Chapman v. Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana 128 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See Hargrave v. State, DOTD, 12-0341 (La.10/16/12), (wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court rejected a court’s requirement that a vocational rehabilitation counselor comply with certain prophylactic claimant-requested conditions absent evidence as to an actual dispute regarding the quality of the services provided by the counselor or the necessity of such services.)