DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bryant, 101 So. 3d 429.

33 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Albert Lewis La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Monteco K. Frost La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
    10/16/12), State v. Bailey, 48,042 (La.
  • State v. Gasser 275 So. 3d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    10/16/12), , 433, the Louisiana Supreme Court held as a matter of law that an "entry" for purposes of the crime of burglary occurs when any part of the intruder's person crosses the plane of the threshold.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Ronald Gasser La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    10/16/12), the Louisiana Supreme Court held as a matter of law that an “entry” for purposes of the crime of burglary occurs when any part of the intruder’s person crosses the plane of the threshold.
  • State v. Latique 265 So. 3d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    10/16/12), , 432-433, the supreme court addressed the meaning of "entry" as contemplated in La.R.S.
  • State of Louisiana v. Elijah James Latique La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    10/16/12), -433, the supreme court addressed the meaning of “entry” as contemplated in La.R.S.
  • State of Louisiana v. Katron v. Richard A/K/A Katron Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    In State v. Bryant, 12–233 (La.10/16/12), the Louisiana supreme court addressed the sufficiency of the evidence claims, reiterating that the appellate review of such claims is controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Katron 265 So. 3d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    10/16/12), , the Louisiana supreme court addressed the sufficiency of the evidence claims, reiterating that the appellate review of such claims is controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. William Felix Vail La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    5/16/14), this court discussed the standard of review for sufficiency of evidence, as follows: In State v. Bryant, 12-233 (La.10/16/12), the Louisiana supreme court addressed the sufficiency of the evidence claims, reiterating that the appellate review of such claims is controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Vail 236 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    10/16/12), , the Louisiana supreme court addressed the sufficiency of the evidence claims, reiterating that the appellate review of such claims is controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Mays 244 So. 3d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    10/16/12), ; State v. Steward , 51,006 (La.
  • State v. Lee 243 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Steward 213 So. 3d 1174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Joshua Jerome Ball La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    10/16/12), -33, writ denied, 12-229 (La.
  • State v. Ball 209 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    10/16/12), -33 , writ denied, 12-229 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamal Anthony Charles AKA - Jamal A. Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 4/1/15), 651(alteration in original) this court explained: The standard of review for an insufficient evidence claim is well-settled: In State v. Bryant, 12-233 (La.10/16/12), the Louisiana [S]upreme [C]ourt addressed the sufficiency of the evidence claims, reiterating that the appellate review of such claims is controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S
  • State v. Charles 178 So. 3d 1157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 4/1/15), 651 (alteration in original) this court explained: The standard of review for an insufficient evidence claim is well-settled: In State v. Bryant, 12-233 (La.10/16/12), , the Louisiana [Sjupreme [Cjourt addressed the sufficiency of the evidence claims, reiterating that the appellate review of such claims is controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ernest Carter, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review for an insufficient evidence claim is well-settled: In State v. Bryant, 12-233 (La.10/16/12), the Louisiana [S]upreme [C]ourt addressed the sufficiency of the evidence claims, reiterating that the appellate review of such claims is controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S
  • State v. Carter 160 So. 3d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review for an insufficient evidence claim is well-settled: In State v. Bryant, 12-233 (La.10/16/12), , the Louisiana [S]upreme [C]ourt addressed the sufficiency of the evidence claims, reiterating that the appellate review of such claims is controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Dibartolo 168 So. 3d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Bryant, 12-233 (La.10/16/12), , analyzed the term “entry” and concurred with its universal definition and held that “entry” occurs when any part of the intruder’s person crosses the plane of the threshold.
  • State of Louisiana v. Daniel Brandon Prince La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    10/16/12), (quoting State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.
  • State v. Prince 155 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    In review of whether the evidence presented was sufficient to support a conviction, “an appellate court ‘must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.’” State v. Bryant, 12-233, p. 5 (La.10/16/12), (quoting State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.5/20/03), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Jon Dickerson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    STANDARD OF REVIEW In State v. Bryant, 12-233 (La.10/16/12), the Louisiana supreme court addressed the sufficiency of the evidence claims, reiterating that the appellate review of such claims is controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Dickerson 140 So. 3d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    STANDARD OF REVIEW In State v. Bryant, 12-233 (La.10/16/12), , the Louisiana supreme court addressed the sufficiency of the evidence claims, reiterating that the appellate review of such claims is controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Wardell Christopher Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    10/16/12), the Louisiana supreme court addressed the sufficiency of the evidence claims, reiterating that the appellate review of such claims is controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Williams 124 So. 3d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    In State v. Bryant, 12-233 (La.10/16/12), , the Louisiana supreme court addressed the sufficiency of the evidence claims, reiterating that the appellate review of such claims is controlled by the standard enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Bailey 115 So. 3d 739 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Bryant, 12-233 (La.10/16/12), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher Marshall, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Marshall 157 So. 3d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Bryant, 12-233 (La.10/16/12), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Alton Ray La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    10/16/12), (quoting State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.
  • State v. Ray 157 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), standard, which directs that an appellate court “must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Bryant, 12-233, p. 5 (La.10/16/12), (quoting State v. Tate, 01-1658 (La.5/20/03), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Willis J. Mouton AKA Willis James Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Mouton 129 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    In the present case, we affirm the trial court’s ruling with respect to simple burglary in light of the supreme court’s ruling in State v. Bryant, 12-233 (La.10/16/12), .