Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Poree, 68 So. 83.

16 citing documents.

State v. Hills 129 So. 2d 12 La. 1961
charge is misleading, seeks to give the impression that certain testimony conclusively showed a discrepancy in the prosecuting witness’ description of the clothing worn by the assailant — but that such conclusion is unwarranted; and that the Court’s refusal to give a special charge which would have to be corrected to be made applicable to the law and the facts was no error, , 68 So.
State v. Eyer 110 So. 2d 521 La. 1959
State v. Sears 55 So. 2d 881 La. 1951
State v. Sears 55 So. 2d 881 La. 1951
State v. Alexander 40 So. 2d 232 La. 1949
Except as otherwise provided herein, the judge must give every such requested charge that is wholly correct and wholly pertinent, unless the matter contained in such charge have been already given, or unless such charge require qualification, limitation or explanation.” , 68 So.
State v. Broussard 12 So. 2d 218 La. 1942
State v. Courreges 9 So. 2d 453 La. 1942
Article 390, Code of Criminal Procedure; , 68 So.
State v. Stroud 5 So. 2d 125 La. 1941
State v. Smith 199 So. 791 La. 1940
State v. Boone 195 So. 511 La. 1940
State v. Chretien 167 So. 426 La. 1936
State v. Seal 143 So. 18 La. 1932
State v. Seal 143 So. 18 La. 1932
7 ; State *20 v. Poree, , 68 So.
State v. Newman 102 So. 671 La. 1925
State v. Schaff 98 So. 251 La. 1923
372 , 44 L. R. A. 837; , 68 South.
State v. Miller 70 So. 330 La. 1915