Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sabine Tram Co. v. Jurgens, 79 So. 872.
- Judy Lyons v. Ann Knight La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
- Lyons v. Knight 65 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-
Arledge v. Hendricks
715 So. 2d 135
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Quoting with approval Sabine Tram Co. v. Jurgens, et al, , 79 So.
-
Freeman v. Cooper
414 So. 2d 355
La. 1982
Sabine Tram Co. v. Jurgens, et al. [ ], 79 So.
- Union Service & Maintenance Co. v. Powell 393 So. 2d 94 La. 1980
- Freeman v. Cooper 390 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
- Calvert v. Simon 311 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
-
Jones v. Davis
233 So. 2d 310
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1970
708 ; Sabine Tram Company v. Jurgens, *316 , 79 So.
-
Miller, Smith and Champagne v. Capital City Press
142 So. 2d 462
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
That it is essential, and a 1095 , 79 So.
- Oakes v. Alexander 135 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
-
Waldo v. Morrison
58 So. 2d 210
La. 1952
That it is essential, and a 1095 , 79 So.
- Robinson Mercantile Co. v. Freeman 172 So. 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
-
Pelletier v. Pugh
132 So. 769
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
1093 , , the Supreme Court of the state, in re-affirming that right, said: “No one has a right to deem appropriate or pertinent to an issue presented for decision in a judicial proceeding a libelous allegation that he knows is false or that he has not just or probable cause to believe is true.” The defendant in this cas
- Manuel v. Deshotels 107 So. 478 La. 1926