Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Board of Com'rs v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., 74 So. 921.

33 citing documents.

Quantum Resources Management, L.L.C. v. Pirate Lake Oil Corp. 170 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The court held in favor of the plaintiff that the 1925 tax sale was an absolute nullity, citing Waterman and its predecessor, Board of Commisioners v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Meares v. Pioneer Production Corp. 382 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
35 (La.1908); Board of Comm'rs v. Concordia Land & Timber Company, , 74 So.
Wood v. Board of Commissioners ex rel. Pontchartrain Levee District 338 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Board of Comm’rs v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Fleckinger v. Smith 319 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
907 (1913); *891 Board of Commissioners v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
White v. Phillips Petroleum Company 232 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
274 ; Board of Com'rs for Fifth Louisiana Levee District v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
McCarthy v. Gonnet 163 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Johnston v. Nanney 155 So. 2d 196 La. 1963
582 ; Board of Commissioners v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Newman v. McClure 134 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Heirs of Boagni v. Thornton 132 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
1 Cir., and Board of Commissioners, etc. v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Wood v. Police Jury of the Parish of Jefjerson 121 So. 2d 218 La. 1960
531 ; Board of Com’rs v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Thomas v. Bomer-Blanks Lumber Co. 105 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
In Board of Com’rs v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
La Caze v. Boycher 80 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
35 ; Board of Commissioners v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Lacaze v. Boycher 71 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
cres constituted a part of the 7 acres under assessment No. 1064 so as to make-certain or eliminate the possibility of partial payment of taxes prior to the sale under assessment No. 1064, which might or might not be the case under the doctrine of Prampin v. Southern Chemical Works, La.App., ; Board of Commissioners for 5th Louisiana Levee District v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Thurmon v. Hogg 72 So. 2d 500 La. 1954
Counsel for plaintiff cites Board of Commissioners for Fifth Louisiana Levee District v. Concordia Land & Timber Company, [ 74 So.
Prampin v. Southern Chemical Works 53 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Board of Commissioners for Fifth Louisiana Levee District v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Waterman v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co. 35 So. 2d 225 La. 1947
See Board of Commissioners v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Weaver Bros. Realty Corporation v. Vines 23 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Guidry v. Sigler 21 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
As was said in the case of Board of Commissioners v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., at page 255, 74 So.
Guidry v. Sigler 20 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
We quote the following from the syllabus of the case of Board of Commissioners, etc., v. Concordia Land Timber Co., , 74 So.
Yuges Realty, Ltd. v. Jefferson Parish Developers, Inc. 18 So. 2d 607 La. 1944
274 ; Board of Com’rs for Fifth Louisiana Levee District v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Johnson v. Chapman 183 So. 285 La. 1938
“On the case as presented, we are bound to conclude that the Wrights acquired no title to this tract of 40 acres.” In the case of Board of Commissioners v. Concordia Land & Timber Company, , 74 So.
Gayle v. Slicer 178 So. 498 La. 1938
883 ; Board of Commissioners v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Johnson v. Chapman 179 So. 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Tensas Delta Land Co. v. Whatley 171 So. 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Board of Commissioners v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Jefferson v. Schenck 145 So. 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
can be set aside in all cases where the taxes for which the property was sold were paid prior to the date of the sale, as in the present case.” The prescriptive period sought to be invoked is effective only against irregularities, such as improper spelling of the owner’s name in which the property, is assessed, faulty advertisement, etc. Board of Commissioners v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Schultz v. Kellar 136 So. 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
875 ; Board of Com’rs v. *657 Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Dupuis v. Reynaud 8 La. App. 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1928
679 ; Board of Commissioners of Levee District vs. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Blanchard v. Estate of Hy Garland 6 La. App. 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Board of Com’rs vs. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 South.
Stanley v. Snell 5 La. App. 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Board of Com’rs, Fifth Louisiana Levee District vs. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 So.
Hollingsworth v. Schanland 99 So. 613 La. 1924
883 ; Board of Commissioners v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 South.
National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co. 97 So. 272 La. 1922
The other case is that of the Fifth Levee District v. Concordia Land & Timber Co. reported in , 74 South.
Eivers' Heirs v. Rankin's Heirs 90 So. 419 La. 1921
35 ; Board of Commissioners v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 South.
Mecom v. Graves 86 So. 917 La. 1921
35 ; Board of Commissioners v. Concordia Land & Timber Co., , 74 South.