Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sammons v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co., 79 So. 320.
-
Kirsch v. Kirsch
180 So. 3d 417
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
& Light Co., , 79 So.
-
Voelkel v. State
671 So. 2d 478
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
& Light Co., , 79 So.
- Ratcliff v. Boydell 566 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
-
Thomas v. Reliance Insurance Company
215 So. 2d 515
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
& Light Co., , 79 So.
-
Tauzier v. Bondio
111 So. 2d 756
La. 1959
& Light Co., , 79 So, 320 ; Bergeron v. Department of Highways, 221 La.
-
Elliott v. Heard
46 So. 2d 249
La. 1950
& Light Co., , 79 So.
-
Bannister v. Chisesi Longo
5 So. 2d 145
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
435 , and the other decisions to the same effect); , 79 So.
-
Albin v. Harvey Jones
160 So. 163
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
& Light Company, , 79 So.
-
Guess Albin v. Worman
160 So. 162
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
& Light Co., , 79 So.
-
Great Southern Lumber Co. v. James Stanton Const. Co.
151 So. 66
La. 1933
359 , 360, it was held that a motion to dismiss an appeal on the ground “that the transcript fails to show any order of appeal from the only final judgment ‘read and signed’ ” came too late, because it was filed after the lapse of three days; but, in the following cases, the doctrine of Gagneaux v. Desonier was affirmed, viz.: Sammons v. New Orleans Railway & Light Company, , 79 So.
-
Dufrene v. Dufrene
149 So. 889
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
734 , ; Doiron v. Vacuum Oil Co., 165 La.
-
Almerico v. Louis A. Billa & Co.
131 So. 620
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
* * * ” In interpreting this article and in passing on a contention identical with that now under consideration, the Supreme Court in Sammons v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co., , 79 So.
-
Cook v. Ruston Oil Mills & Fertilizer Co.
127 So. 347
La. 1930
& Light Co., , 79 So.
-
Taranto v. Orleans Kenner Traction Co.
8 La. App. 715
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Sammonds vs. N. O. Railway & Light Company, , 79 So.
- Colbert v. Alphonse Brenner Co. 8 La. App. 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
- Casey v. Shreveport Railways Co. 7 La. App. 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
-
Lafayette v. Farr
110 So. 624
La. 1926
Ann. 435 , and the other decisions to the same effect); Sammons v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co., , 79 So.
-
Willis v. Road District No. 5
10 La. App. 703
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1920
282 ; Sammons vs. N. O. Railway & Light Co., , 79 So.