Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Myers v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co., 74 So. 256.

83 citing documents.

Boyte v. Ward North American Insurance Co. 818 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Lyons v. Bechtel Corp. 788 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Bostwick v. MAPP Industries, Inc. 707 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Guillory v. Interstate Gas Station 653 So. 2d 1152 La. 1995
Pappas v. Marine Spill Response Corp. 650 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Anderson v. Mamgano 652 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources 593 So. 2d 346 La. 1992
Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources 580 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
& Navigation Co., , 74 So.
Brown v. Flowers Baking Co. 555 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Meaux v. Cormier 554 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
& Navigation Co., , 74 So.
Duncan v. South Cent. Bell Telephone 554 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Glory v. ZUPPARDO'S ECONO. SUPERMARKET, INC. 532 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Ducote v. Albert 521 So. 2d 399 La. 1988
Guidry, supra; Myers v. Louisiana Railway & Navigation Co., , 74 So.
Raybol v. Louisiana State University 520 So. 2d 724 La. 1988
Dupre v. LA RETAILERS ASS'N SELF-INSURERS 509 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
and Navigation Co., , 74 So.
Palermo v. Reliance Ins. Co. 501 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Belt v. STATE EX REL. LA. BD. OF COSMETOLOGY, COMMERCE DEPT. 493 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
and Navigation Co., , 74 So.
Sanders v. Chesson 467 So. 2d 1388 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
and Navigation Co., , 74 So.
Verrette v. Town of Ponchatoula 464 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Roberts v. American Motorists Insurance 431 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Guidry v. Sline Indus. Painters, Inc. 418 So. 2d 626 La. 1982
Whitney v. US Fid. & Guar. Ins. Co. 373 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Whitney v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance 373 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Mitchell v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. 341 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
[See Myers v. Louisiana Railway & Navigation Company, , 74 So.
Hall v. Joiner 324 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Spain v. Travelers Indemnity Company 321 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Lisonbee v. Chicago Mill and Lumber Company 278 So. 2d 5 La. 1973
Lisonbee v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. 259 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Brown v. Hertz Corp. 246 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Francis v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation 225 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
Blade v. Mervis 226 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
Gorings v. Edwards 222 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
Powell v. Gold Crown Stamp Company 204 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
937 , (1917) case concluded, no exact formula can be laid down which will adequately solve every case.
Bates v. Gulf States Utilities Company 193 So. 2d 255 La. 1966
Rogers v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company 173 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
The two leading cases which set out rules or tests to be applied in determining whether an accident is one "arising out of" the employment are Myers v. Louisiana Railway & Navigation Company, , 74 So.
Blake v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 169 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Stubblefield v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 157 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
A further contention is grounded upon error charged to the trial court for resting its decision upon the holding in Myers v. Louisiana Railway & Navigation Company, , 74 So.
Williams v. United States Casualty Company 145 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Rodgers v. Price 92 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
O'CONNOR v. American Mutual Liability Ins. Co. 87 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Rosenquist v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company 78 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Edwards v. Louisiana Forestry Commission 49 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1950
Warren v. Globe Indemnity Co. 46 So. 2d 66 La. 1950
280 , , resulted from a liberal interpretation of the words "arising out of" the employment as used in the compensation actfor, under the prior decisions of our courts, beginning with Myers v. Louisiana Railway & Navigation Co., , 74 So.
Fields v. Brown Paper Mill Co. 28 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
938 , , decided in 1917, not long after the adoption of Act No. 20 of 1914.
Gross v. Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co. 25 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
Hecht v. Higgins Industries 25 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
Milton v. T. J. Moss Tie Co. 20 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
677 , and to Myers v. Louisiana Railway Navigation Company, reported in , 74 So.
Harvey v. Caddo De Soto Cotton Oil Co. 6 So. 2d 747 La. 1942
Harvey v. Caddo De Soto Cotton Oil Co. 6 So. 2d 747 La. 1942
Harvey v. Caddo De Soto Cotton Oil Co. 6 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
We believe the case of Myers v. Louisiana Railway Navigation Company, decided February 12, 1917, and reported in , 74 So.