Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co., 90 So. 512.

40 citing documents.

Hope Dauzat v. Avoyelles Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Dauzat ex rel. Bradford v. Avoyelles Parish School Board 86 So. 3d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
& Light Co., , 90 So.
Amos v. St. Martin Parish School Bd. 773 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
& Light Co., , 90 So.
Parker v. Southwestern Offshore Corp. 763 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
& Light Co., , 90 So.
Green v. Taca International Airlines 304 So. 2d 357 La. 1974
& Light Co., , 90 So.
Matte v. Continental Trailways, Inc. 278 So. 2d 60 La. 1973
376 (1930); Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co., , 90 So.
Shelts v. Jackson 254 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co., , 90 So.
Johnson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 139 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
376 ; Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co., , 90 So.
Woods v. Hinton 116 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
See: Mire v. Lafourche Parish School Board, La.App.1952-1953, ; Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co., , 90 So.
Deason v. Greyhound Corporation 106 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co., , 90 So.
Llorens v. City of Alexandria 106 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
538 ; Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co., , 90 So.
Andrepont v. Ochsner 84 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
376 , 378: "`Our conclusion is that the doctrine of the Hopkins, Spurlock, and LeBlanc cases [Hopkins v. New Orleans R. & L. Co., , 90 So.
Hayes v. Illinois Central Railroad 83 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Our Supreme Court held in Hopkins v. New Orleans R. & Light Co., , at page 74, 90 So.
Mire v. Lafourche Parish School Board 62 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
See Hopkins v. N. O. Railway & Light Co., , 90 So.
Etress v. Shreveport Rys. Co. 33 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
Wallace v. Shreveport Rys. Co. 175 So. 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
& Light Co., , 90 So.
Hart v. Gulf, M. N. R. Co. 167 So. 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
& Light Co., , 90 So.
Alford v. Bisso Ferry Co. 161 So. 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
& Light Co., , 90 So.
Upton v. Bell Cabs, Inc. 154 So. 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
& Light Co., , 90 So.
Johnston v. City of Monroe 147 So. 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
290 , Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co., , 90 So.
Bacon v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 137 So. 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
& Light Co., , 90 So.
Ritchie v. N. O. Public Service, Inc. 132 So. 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
303 ; Hopkins v. N. O. Railway & Light Co., , 90 So.
Brisolara v. Caddo-Transfer & Warehouse Co. 127 So. 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
& Light Co., , 90 So.
Thomas v. Shreveport Railways Co. 13 La. App. 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Baptiste v. N. O. Pub. Service, Inc. 127 So. 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
& Light Co., , 90 So.
Livaudais v. Black 127 So. 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
575 ; Hopkins vs. New Orleans Railway & Light Co., , 90 So.
Cusimano v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 127 So. 376 La. 1930
But both the trial court and the Court of Appeal found for the plaintiff on the theory that it had been decided by this court in Hopkins v. N. O. Railway & Light Co., , 90 So.
Cusimano v. N. O. Pub. Service, Inc. 122 So. 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
& Light Co., , 90 So.
Nee v. N. O. Public Service, Inc. 123 So. 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Harang v. N. O. Public Service, Inc. 119 So. 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Matthews v. N. O. Public Service Inc. 8 La. App. 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
In such case the passenger is bound to conduct himself with the care and caution which his position requires, and the Company is bound to guard him from dangers incident to the position arising from its own acts.” In the case of Hopkins vs. Rrd., , 90 So.
Rizzo v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co. 7 La. App. 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
App. 64; also , 90 South.
Guidry v. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. 6 La. App. 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Gallman v. Young 6 La. App. 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
506 , and Hopkins vs. the same, , 90 South.
Lonatro v. Palace Theatre Co. 5 La. App. 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Foster v. New Orleans Public Service Inc. 3 La. App. 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
& Light Co., , 90 South.
Johnson v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. 2 La. App. 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
& L. Co., , 90 South.
Shally v. N O. Public Service & Sewerage & Water Board 1 La. App. 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
This case was affirmed in Hopkins vs. N. O. Ry., (72), 90 South.
Hopkins v. National Surety Co. 103 So. 314 La. 1924
On January 2, 1922, plaintiff obtained final judgment against the New Orleans Railway & Light Company for $10,000, with interest, etc. See Hopkins v. N. O. Railway & Light Co., , 90 So.
Hopkins v. National Surety Co. 97 So. 297 La. 1923
PAUL, J. This case is the sequel to Hopkins v. N. O. Railway & Light Co., , 90 South.