Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Griffing v. Taft, 91 So. 832.
- Daniel J. Saloom, Et Al. v. State Of Louisiana, Department Of Transportation And Development La. 2022
- Scobee v. Brame 721 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
- Gulf States Corp. v. Barberate 486 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Berry v. Captain 360 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
- Verret v. Norwood 311 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
- Butler v. Butler 212 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
-
Cattle Farms, Inc. v. Abercrombie
211 So. 2d 354
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
932 ; ; and Giffing v. Taft (on rehearing), , 91 So.
- Jackson v. Hanna 206 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
-
Gaudet v. Lawes
197 So. 2d 723
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
138, 140 , this Court, citing a number of authorities, said: 'It is well settled that: “The presumption ‘omnia rite’ applies to tax sales after parties have slept on their rights for many years.” ’ “ , 91 So.
-
Shell v. Greer
171 So. 2d 672
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
See Griffing v. Taft (1922), , 91 So.
- Guillory v. Desormeaux 166 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Boudoin 154 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
- Newman v. McClure 134 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
-
Blair v. Arrant
130 So. 2d 457
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Our esteemed brother below stated in his reasons for judgment that the case of Griffing v. Taft, 1922, , 91 So.
- Mills v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. 129 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
- Watson v. Crown-Zellerbach Corp. 110 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. Jordan 92 So. 2d 377 La. 1956
- Smith v. Smith 89 So. 2d 55 La. 1956
-
Broxton v. Davis
80 So. 2d 593
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Addison v. Kirby Lumber Co. [La.App.], ; , 91 So.
- Callahan v. Authement 77 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
- Steele v. Montgomery 72 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
- Robinson v. Dunson 65 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
-
Kathman-Landry, Inc. v. Morrison
64 So. 2d 40
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1953
It is beyond attack and becomes indefeasible after the period of redemption (now three years) has expired.” , 91 So.
- Fried v. Edmiston 50 So. 2d 19 La. 1950
- Bradford v. Ducote 49 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1950
- Weaver Bros. Realty Corporation v. Vines 23 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
- Settoon v. Sharp 19 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
- Yuges Realty, Ltd. v. Jefferson Parish Developers, Inc. 18 So. 2d 607 La. 1944
-
Picou v. Dubois
13 So. 2d 543
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
1013 and 1423 ; , 91 So.
-
White v. Hodges
9 So. 2d 433
La. 1942
Griffing, et al. v. Taft (on rehearing), , 91 So.
-
Egle v. Constantin
5 So. 2d 281
La. 1941
138, 140 , this Court, citing a number of authorities, said: “It is well settled that: ‘The presumption “omnia rite” applies to tax sales after parties have slept on their rights for many years.’ ” , 91 So.
- Ward v. South Coast Corporation 3 So. 2d 689 La. 1941
- Addison v. Kirby Lumber Corporation 3 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1941
- Dugas v. Powell 1 So. 2d 677 La. 1941
- Mims v. Sample 186 So. 66 La. 1938
- Sparks v. Dan Cohen Co. 175 So. 590 La. 1937
- Bauer v. Albers 175 So. 39 La. 1937
- Soule v. West 170 So. 26 La. 1936
- Buillard v. Davis 169 So. 78 La. 1936
-
Cherami v. Cantrelle
142 So. 150
La. 1932
451 , ; Berry v. Wagner, 151 La.
- Harrell v. Harrell 142 So. 138 La. 1932
-
Foster v. Spann
129 So. 622
La. 1930
452 , , 836: "The institution of a suit claiming title to property by inheritance from a deceased person is an unconditional acceptance of his succession.
-
Foster v. Spann
129 So. 622
La. 1930
452 , , 836: “The institution of a suit claiming title to property by inheritance from a deceased person is an unconditional acceptance of his succession.
- Ely v. Coreil 116 So. 834 La. 1928
-
Ryals v. Todd
116 So. 395
La. 1927
“The want of sufficient notice urged presents scant ground for complaint, as it is not sus- ' tained.” *959 , 91 So.
-
Rey v. Culbertson
2 La. App. 805
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
170 ; Griffing vs. Taft, , 91 South.
- Crouch v. Richardson 104 So. 728 La. 1925