Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Beird, 82 So. 881.

21 citing documents.

Succession of Greer v. Wiggins 315 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Succession of Boyd 306 So. 2d 687 La. 1975
Upon the authority of , 82 So.
Succession of Boyd 295 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Our Supreme Court in Succession of Beird [145 La.756], (1919), held that a "slash” date does not satisfy the requirements of Article 1588 and a testament dated in that manner is invalid for lack of a date.
Succession of Gafford 180 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
The Supreme Court was confronted with a "slash-date" olographic will dated "9/8/18" in the , 82 So.
Succession of Koerkel 174 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
However, recognizing the issue to be settled by the Supreme Court in , 82 So.
Succession of Mayer 144 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
We concur with the reasoning of our learned brother of the district court in observing that the last direct pronouncement by our Supreme Court on this point is found in the , 82 So.
Succession of Gaudin 140 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Without question, the , 82 So.
Succession of Bendily 132 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Succession of Gaudin 98 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Subsequently, in , 82 So.
Succession of Mutin 94 So. 2d 420 La. 1957
Succession of Morales 94 So. 2d 420 La. 1957
Succession of Sarrazin 65 So. 2d 602 La. 1953
Love v. Dawkins 62 So. 2d 399 La. 1952
In other cases, as , 82 So.
Love v. Dawkins 62 So. 2d 399 La. 1952
In other cases, as Succession of' Beird, , 82 So.
Succession of Butterworth 196 So. 39 La. 1940
Succession of Lasseigne 181 So. 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
The opponents of the will rely exclusively on the decision of the Supreme Court in the , 82 So.
Picard v. Succession of Picard 155 So. 11 La. 1934
Succession of Kron 135 So. 19 La. 1931
736 , , 6 A. L. R. 1452; Heffner v. Heffner, 48 La.
Jones v. Kyle 123 So. 306 La. 1929
Succession of Dyer 99 So. 214 La. 1924
Succession of Gheens 4 Pelt. 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1921