Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cooper v. Edwards, 92 So. 721.

26 citing documents.

White v. White 233 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
The payment inures to the benefit of all the owners, who may assert their rights by paying up their pro-rata share of the taxes; , 92 So.
Guilbeau v. Jeanerette Lumber & Shingle Co. 232 So. 2d 67 La. 1970
Cooper v. Edwards, 1922, , 92 So.
Guilbeau v. Jeanerette Lumber & Shingle Co. 219 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Cooper v. Edwards, 1922, , 92 So.
Muff v. Algermissen 198 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Cooper v. Edwards, 1922, , 92 So.
Jacobs v. Metcalfe 185 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Cooper v. Edwards, 1922, , 92 So.
Succession of Caldwell 147 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
British American Oil Producing Company v. Grizzaffi 135 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Newman v. McClure 134 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Welsh v. Lagasse 128 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1961
Atlantic Refining Company v. Golson 127 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Cooper v. Edwards, 1922, , 92 So.
Ewald v. Hodges 120 So. 2d 465 La. 1960
* * * ’ “Our Stipreme Court made a clear statement of this fact in the case of Cooper vs. Edwards, , 92 So.
Hodgeson v. McDaniel 96 So. 2d 481 La. 1957
Esso Standard Oil Company v. Jordan 92 So. 2d 377 La. 1956
Robinson v. Commercial Cattle Co. 82 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Marks 74 So. 2d 36 La. 1954
Huckabay v. Texas Co. 73 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
19 , ] : “The fact is that when parties own lands or leases or other property in common and cannot agree between themselves, the obvious course for •them to follow is to demand a partition thereof between them.” But the holding of the Supreme Court as pronounced in the opinion by Mr. Justice McCaleb in Starr Davis Oil Comp
Bridges v. Trevino 64 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Newman v. McClure 62 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
Some of these cases are: , 92 So.
Keller v. Haas 24 So. 2d 610 La. 1945
The lower court further declared that the title acquired by W. D. Haas at the August 8, 1922, tax sale was protected by the prescription of three years relative to tax deeds, under the Constitution, , 92 So.
Ensminger v. Vampran 15 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Bell v. Canal Bank & Trust Co. 190 So. 359 La. 1939
Tyson v. York 188 So. 33 La. 1939
(1) Plaintiffs, defendants in the petitory action, argue that seven years is an unreasonable time within which to allow defendants, plaintiffs in the petitory action, to assert their claim to the property, and cite in support of their contention, , 92 So.
Boutwell v. Gunter 185 So. 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
A long line of cases, including, Duson v. Roos, supra; , 92 So.
Harrell v. Harrell 142 So. 138 La. 1932
Ramsey v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. 123 So. 114 La. 1929
The judgment appealed from, sustaining the plea of estoppel and plea ,of prescription, , 92 So.
Doiron v. Lock, Moore & Co. 115 So. 366 La. 1927