State v. Miller
State v. Miller, 83 So. 539 (La. 1919).
Cited by
- State v. Allen 276 So. 2d 868 La. 1973
- State v. Armstrong 260 So. 2d 680 La. 1972
- State v. Cockerham 115 So. 750 La. 1928
- State v. Kahn 98 So. 86 La. 1923
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Miller 138 La. 373
- State v. Bradley 136 La. 55
- State v. Evans 135 La. 891
Opinion text
MONROE, C. J. Defendant appeals from a conviction and death sentence under an indictment for murder. The transcript discloses no bill of exception signed by the trial judge. After conviction defendant moved for a new trial, on the grounds that the verdict is contrary to law and the evidence, and that he was tried on a dies non; that is to say, was tried on October 13th following a Sunday, the árgument being that a day “following a legal holiday” is a dies non. The motion was overruled, and he reserved a bill of exception, but the bill was not prepared and presented to the judge, and does not appear in the transcript. [1, 2] It is well settled that the mere minute entry showing the reservation of a bill of exception in a criminal case cannot receive consideration in this court. The bill must be written out and signed by the judge. State v. Miller, 138 La. 373 , 70 South. 330 ; State v. Bradley, 136 La. 55 , 66 South. 395 ; State v. Evans, 135 La. 891 , 66 South. 259 . Beyond that, Act 167 of 1918, reads in part: “The following shall be considered as days of public rest and legal holidays and half holidays in this state, and no other, namely: Sundays ; * * * and in all cities and towns whose population exceed 10,000, whenever the first of January, * * * the 12th of October, * * * shall fall on a Sunday the succeeding day shall he a legal holiday.” etc. And no effort was made to show that “Homer,” where defendant was tried, is a city or town the population of which exceeds 10,000. The conviction and sentence appealed from are therefore affirmed.