Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sears v. Peytral, 92 So. 561.

15 citing documents.

Arabie Bros. Trucking Co. v. Gautreaux 880 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
947, 953 , (1943); -976 , 92 So.
Walker v. ACADIAN BUILDERS OF GONZALES 797 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Shepherd v. Fort Sherwood Apartments 270 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Brown v. Hertz Corp. 246 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Liner v. Travelers Ins. Co. 41 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Harkness v. Olcott-Stone Motors 14 So. 2d 773 La. 1943
Staples v. Henderson Jersey Farms, Inc. 181 So. 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
The nearest approach to such a provision is that part of section 28 of the act, reading as follows: “Or (3) by the injured employee’s deliberate failure to use an adequate guard or protection against accident provided for him.” Construing this exception, , 92 So.
Cole v. List & Weatherly Const. Co. 156 So. 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Ford v. City of Alexandria 151 So. 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Daigle v. Moody 144 So. 596 La. 1932
Daigle v. Moody 140 So. 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Kern v. Southport Mill, Ltd. 141 So. 19 La. 1932
McClendon v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co. 135 So. 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Jones v. Landry 122 So. 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
670 , and Sears vs. Peytral, , 92 So.
Flowers v. Williams-Rieves Lumber Co. 5 La. App. 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
248 , supra, and Sears vs. Petral, , 92 South.