Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rush v. Town of Farmerville, 101 So. 243.
- Andrew F. Payne v. Gregory Glen Stanley, Mitchell B. Stanley, and Michael Brian Stanley La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
-
Curole v. Delcambre
224 So. 3d 1074
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
In a prior case with similar facts, the Louisiana Supreme Court reached a , 101 So.
- Cheramie Services, Inc. v. Shell Deepwater Production, Inc. 14 So. 3d LV La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- Cheramie Services v. Shell Deepwater Prod. 14 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
- Ross v. Conoco, Inc. 828 So. 2d 546 La. 2002
-
Ross v. Conoco, Inc.
805 So. 2d 352
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
urt long ago held “when a tort is perpetrated through the instrumentality of a combination or *358 conspiracy, the party wronged and injured may look beyond the actual participants in committing the injury, and join with them, as defendants, all who cooperated in, advised, or assisted in the accomplishment of the common design, for co-trespassers are bound in solido.” , 101 So.
-
Stephens v. Bail Enforcement of Louisiana
690 So. 2d 124
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
3 Cir.1973), [ writ denied, ]; , 101 So.
- Clay v. International Harvester Co. 674 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
-
Guidry v. Bank of LaPlace
661 So. 2d 1052
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
751 (La.1931); , 101 So.
- Strahan v. STATE, THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY 645 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-
National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Spillars
552 So. 2d 627
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
3d Cir.1973) [writ denied ]; , 101 So.
- Miller v. Keating 339 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
-
State v. Jack
285 So. 2d 204
La. 1973
855 , (1924); State v. Hodgeson, 130 La.
- Tabb v. Norred 277 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
-
State v. Smith
250 So. 2d 724
La. 1971
855 , ; State v. Borde, 209 La.
- McCrossen v. Stoyka 218 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1969
- Franks v. City of Alexandria 128 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
-
Brown v. City of Shreveport
129 So. 2d 540
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
433 ; Rush v. Town of Farmerville, 1924, , 101 So.
- Loeblich v. Garnier 113 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
-
S. & R. Gas Co. v. Stephens
90 So. 2d 487
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
On the same general proposition, and to -the same effect, , 101 So.
- State v. Broussard 46 So. 2d 48 La. 1950
-
Shirley v. Town of Winnfield
41 So. 2d 136
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
The brief of counsel for plaintiff contains the following paragraph: "Plaintiff appellant does not strenuously urge that the petition sets forth a cause of action against the Town of Winnfield in view of the jurisprudence of Louisiana as set forth in Rush v. Town of Farmerville et al. [ ], 101 So.
- Cox v. Shreveport Packing Co. 34 So. 2d 373 La. 1948
- Esmele v. Violet Trapping Co. 166 So. 477 La. 1935
-
Buras v. MacHella
134 So. 751
La. 1931
This article declares that: “He who causes another person to do an unlawful act, or assists or encourages in the commission of it, is answerable, in solido, with that person, for the damage caused 'by such act.” Accordingly, , 101 So.
-
Davis v. Poitevant & Favre Lbr. Co.
132 So. 790
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Code, art. 2094; , 101 So.
- Kern v. Knight 127 So. 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
-
Whipple v. Lirette
124 So. 160
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Ann. 92 ; Rush vs. Town of Farmerville et al., , 101 So.