Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dewey v. Lutcher-Moore Lumber Co., 92 So. 273.
- Robbins v. Caraway-Rhodes Veterinary Hospital 299 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
-
Guillory v. Coal Operators Casualty Company
95 So. 2d 201
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
In its defense that the employee's duties were non-hazardous so as not to be within the coverage of the compensation statute, defendant-appellee in a , 92 So.
- Fontenot v. Myers 93 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
- Coleman v. Sears, Roebuck & Company 83 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
- McLin v. Department of Highways of the State 68 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
- Turner v. Maryland Casualty Co. 44 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1950
- Ryland v. R. P. Const. Co. 19 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
- Stephens v. Catalano 7 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
-
Horton v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
200 So. 44
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
314 , and cases therein cited; Dewey v. Lutcher-Moore Lumber Co. , 92 So.
- Gray v. Tremont Lumber Co. 185 So. 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
- Rester v. Community Stores, Inc. 169 So. 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
-
Garrett v. Opelousas Cotton Oil Mill Co.
167 So. 854
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
434, 435 , “courts must have some regal'd for the ordinarily accepted rules of pleading, and reject a petition in any case which does not evidence, in some way, that the plaintiff would be entitled to relief under the administration of evidence in support of the allegations thereof.” , 92 So.
- Wilkie v. Langlois 164 So. 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
- Freiss v. Lone Star Cement Co. 161 So. 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
-
Brown v. Edwards
160 So. 173
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
The judge shall decide the merits of the controversy as equitably, summarily, and simply as may be.’ “The exception of no cause or no right of action should have been overruled.” , 92 So.
- Faulkner v. Milner-Fuller, Inc. 154 So. 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- Hollinsworth v. Crossett Lumber Co. 153 So. 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- Stockstill v. Sears-Roebuck & Co. 151 So. 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- McQueen v. Tremont Lumber Co. 151 So. 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- Hinton v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co. 148 So. 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
- Charity Hospital of Louisiana v. Board of School Directors 140 So. 60 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1932
-
Hinton v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co.
139 So. 554
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1932
C72, , to the point that: “Where the petition of plaintiff in a compensation case fails to disclose that at the time of the alleged accident the plaintiff was engaged in performing services in connection with any of the hazardous occupations named in paragraph two of Section 1 of the Act, or that the business he was engage
- Wright v. Louisiana Ice & Utilities Co. 129 So. 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
- Dartez v. Sterling Sugars, Inc. 7 La. App. 414 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1928
- Mackey v. Fullerton Naval Stores Co. 4 La. App. 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
- Byas v. Hotel Bentley, Inc. 103 So. 303 La. 1924
- Clark v. Alexandria Cooperage & Lumber Co. 102 So. 96 La. 1924