No. 24862
Precedential
Amended
Processed
Saunders v. Bolden
Saunders v. Bolden, 98 So. 867 (La. 1923).
Cited by
- Le Triomphe Partnership v. Dorbandt 527 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- Chauvin v. Bohn 411 So. 2d 442 La. 1982
- Miller v. Miller 335 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
- Neblett v. Placid Oil Company 257 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
- Caire v. Sullivan 162 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Allen v. George 110 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Pierce v. Griffin 95 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
- Succession of Ed Jenkins 91 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
- Stephens v. Bulkley 41 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
- Lemoine v. Lacour 34 So. 2d 392 La. 1948
- Lemoine v. Lacour 28 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
- Cerami v. Haas 197 So. 752 La. 1940
Opinion text
On Application for Rehearing. By the WHOLE COURT. PER CURIAM. The decree is amended by allowing 5 per cent, per annum interest on the amount of the judgment from the date the said judgment of this court shall have become final instead of from March 27, 1920, as allowed in the judgment. With this amendment the rehearing is refused.