Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Saunders v. Bolden, 98 So. 867.
- Le Triomphe Partnership v. Dorbandt 527 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- Chauvin v. Bohn 411 So. 2d 442 La. 1982
- Miller v. Miller 335 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
- Neblett v. Placid Oil Company 257 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
- Caire v. Sullivan 162 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
-
Allen v. George
110 So. 2d 587
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
In this case the Supreme Court stated: “ * * * , 98 So.
- Pierce v. Griffin 95 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
- Succession of Ed Jenkins 91 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
-
Stephens v. Bulkley
41 So. 2d 683
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Counsel for plaintiff contends that this language places the present case within the same category as the case of Saunders v. Bolden, et al, , 98 So.
- Lemoine v. Lacour 34 So. 2d 392 La. 1948
-
Lemoine v. Lacour
28 So. 2d 784
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
Lemoine" Plaintiff in brief in this court relies upon the following cases which he contends support his position, to-wit: , 98 So.
-
Cerami v. Haas
197 So. 752
La. 1940
*1054 , at pages 140 and 141, 98 So.
-
R. F. Grace Printing & Mfg. Co. v. Arnaud's Drug Stores, Inc.
121 So. 359
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
App. 13; Saunders vs. Bolden et al., , 98 So.
- Industrial Lumber Co. v. Rogers 104 So. 367 La. 1923