Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Eberle v. Eberle, 108 So. 549.
-
Steven Paul Pesson v. Heather Dieterich
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
This rule applies whether the party proffering the parol is an heir of the alleged vendee, 108 So.
-
Mitchell v. Clark
448 So. 2d 681
La. 1984
This rule applies whether the party proffering the parol is an heir of the alleged vendee, , 108 So.
- Marchand v. Estate of Loga 354 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Marchand v. Armstrong 354 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Fleming v. Romero 342 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
- Miles v. Miles 328 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
- Allen v. George 110 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Haney v. Dunn 96 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
-
Succession of Nelson
70 So. 2d 665
La. 1953
567, 570 , we said: “It is also the general rule of our jurisprudence that the verity and reality of authentic sales of immovable property can be assailed only in two ways: First, by means of a counter letter; second, by the answers of the other party to interrogatories on facts and articles, which stand in lieu of and are equivalent to a counter letter.” , 108 So.
- Pattison v. Bryan 26 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1946
- Succession of Hollander 24 So. 2d 69 La. 1945
- Succession of Hogh 190 So. 399 La. 1939
- Ceromi v. Harris 175 So. 462 La. 1937
- Sangassan v. Sangassan 158 So. 611 La. 1935
- Carter v. Loeber 148 So. 673 La. 1933
- Smelley v. Ricks 141 So. 445 La. 1932
- Succession of Walsh 131 So. 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
- Succession of Prescott 127 So. 611 La. 1930