Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Snell v. Union Sawmill Co., 105 So. 728.

38 citing documents.

Felicia Wilson Crow v. John T. Crow La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
The courts of our state have long held that “if a party can read, it behooves him to examine an instrument before signing it.” at 608, 105 So.
Bruce Lloyd v. Darlene Elaire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Additionally, the courts of our state have long held that “[i]f a party can read, it behooves him to examine an instrument before signing it; and if he cannot read, it behooves him to have the instrument read to him and listen attentively whilst this is being done.” at 608, 105 So.
Michelle Rung v. Deondrick Bessard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Additionally, “[i]f a party can read, it behooves him to examine an instrument before signing it; and if he cannot read, it behooves him to have the instrument read to him and listen attentively whilst this is being done.”
Rita Garlington Weekley Chapman Leger v. Bank of New York, Mellon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Additionally, the courts of our state have long held that “[i]f a party can read, it behooves him to examine an instrument before signing it; and if he cannot read, it behooves him to have the instrument read to him and listen attentatively [sic] whilst this is being done.” at 6 608, 105 So.
Jonathan Scott Chouest v. Kirt Chouest and Kellie Chouest Duet La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
In Re Succession of Berman 937 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Civil Code art. 1577, Revision Comments-1997(f), citing Snell v. Union Sawmill Company , 105 So.
Joseph and Stacey Williams v. Thomas C. Litton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Williams v. Litton 865 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Boh Bros. Construction Co. v. Price 800 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
"`[I]f a party can read, it behooves him to examine an instrument before signing it; and if he cannot read, it behooves him to have the instrument read to him and listen attentively whilst this is being done.'" , 105 So.
Capdeville v. WHITE'S TEMPLE CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST, INC. 755 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Morin v. Foret 736 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
604 at 608, at 730 (1925).
Smith v. Frey 703 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
494 , the Supreme Court stated "signatures to obligations are not mere ornaments," , 105 So.
LOUISIANA GAMING v. Jerry's Package Store 629 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Barras & Breaux v. Champeaux 526 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Thibodeaux v. American Land & Exploration, Inc. 450 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
604 at 608, at 730 (1925) .
Heyl v. Heyl 445 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Tweedel v. Brasseaux 433 So. 2d 133 La. 1983
Jackson v. Continental Cas. Co. 402 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Ducote 368 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Starns v. Ducote 254 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
1st Cir., 1962); , 105 So.
Cleveland v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. 222 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Commercial Credit Corp. v. Shipp 220 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Trinity Universal Insurance Company v. Good 202 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Moore v. Moore 187 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
Cannon v. Hunt 165 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
St. Landry Loan Company v. Avie 147 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Price v. Taylor 139 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
State ex rel. Langridge v. Harris 138 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1962
Housecraft Division of Southern Siding Co. v. Jones 120 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
494 , the Supreme Court stated "signatures to obligations are not mere ornaments," , 105 So.
State ex rel. Sales v. Ray 111 So. 2d 786 La. 1959
Bennett v. Robinson 25 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
692 ; Snell et al. v. Union Sawmill Co., et al., , 105 So.
Rousseau v. Rousseau 24 So. 2d 676 La. 1946
Green v. Louisiana Highway Commission 3 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Fontenot v. Coreil 2 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1941
McTee & Co. v. Brown Funeral Home, Inc. 183 So. 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Commercial Bank Trust Co. of Alexandria v. Turregano 134 So. 383 La. 1931
Devoe & Raynolds Co. v. Loup 129 So. 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
608 , -730, “Signatures to obligations are not mere ornaments * * And parties who sign negotiable instruments, or other solemn obligations, must expect to be held liable according to the tenor thereof.
Rachman v. Surker 108 So. 130 La. 1926

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by