Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Klein v. Young, 111 So. 495.

65 citing documents.

Billiot v. State 654 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
nt overlooks the basis for the delictual obligation of the owner of a building for damages caused by defects in its structure or appui’tenances: “The obligation of every property owner to answer for damages for a failure to keep his property in such condition of repair that it will not be dangerous to other persons is imposed by law, by Articles 670, 2315, 2322 of the Civil Code.” , 111 So.
Winchell v. Johnson Properties, Inc. 640 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
“[T]he owner cannot by [contracting with another] limit his law-imposed liability to third persons for injuries arising from premise defects.” , 111 So.
Burton v. Housing Authority of New Orleans, Inc. 623 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Hopkins v. Travasos 569 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Moore v. Cameron Parish School Bd. 563 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Services, Inc., , 111 So.
Fontan v. Estopinal 529 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Andrus v. Cajun Insulation Co. 524 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Great Am. Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v. Bass 486 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
9:3221 (Act 174 of 1932) was to legislatively overrule Klein v. Young, 163 La.59, (1926).
Matt v. Cox 478 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. French Eighth 457 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Service, Inc., , 111 So.
LaCour v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 417 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Tassin v. Slidell Mini-Storage, Inc. 396 So. 2d 1261 La. 1981
Louisiana National Leasing Co. v. A. D. F. Services, Inc., , 111 So.
Louisiana Nat. Leasing Corp. v. ADF Service, Inc. 377 So. 2d 92 La. 1979
Olsen v. Shell Oil Co. 365 So. 2d 1285 La. 1978
Loescher v. Parr 324 So. 2d 441 La. 1975
Kirkland v. Western Electric Company, Inc. 296 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
General Leasing Co. v. Leda Towing Co., Inc. 286 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Equilease Corporation v. Hill 290 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Wooten v. Wimberly 272 So. 2d 303 La. 1973
Matthews v. Southern Amusement Company 199 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
Murphy v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York 165 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
Murphy v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York 138 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
Malatesta v. Lowry 130 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
Lyons v. Jahncke Service, Inc. 125 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Next, defendant maintains Articles 2692-2695 , 111 So.
Gilliam v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company 124 So. 2d 913 La. 1960
Marine Insurance Company v. Strecker 100 So. 2d 493 La. 1958
See Articles 670 and 2322 of the Civil Code; , 111 So.
Matranga v. Hilman 94 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Green v. Southern Furniture Company 94 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
But as squarely held by Klein v. Young, 1927, , 111 So.
Green v. Billa 86 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1956
Gaida v. Hourgettes 67 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
They seek to compress their claims within the doctrine of a landlord's liability to his tenant and persons lawfully on the premises, , 111 So.
Robinson v. Fossett 33 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Terrenova v. Feldner 28 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
See Klein v. Young, 1927, , 111 So.
Cheatham v. Bohrer 17 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Johnson v. Nichel 6 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Lowe v. Home Owners' Loan Corporation 6 So. 2d 726 La. 1942
Wallace v. Meyer 4 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Roppolo v. Pick 4 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1941
Staes v. Terranova 4 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Hughes v. Abate 2 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Lowe v. Home Owners' Loan Corporation 1 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
— which are obviously intended to be effective only as between the lessor and the lessee, , 111 So.
Duplain v. Wiltz 194 So. 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Bradley v. Yancy 195 So. 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
214 ; Morris v. Hava, supra; Klein v. Young, *112 , 111 So.
Mills v. Heidingsfield 192 So. 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Morris v. Hava 180 So. 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
It must be either under Civ.Code, art. 670, which, , 111 So.
Tesoro v. Abate 173 So. 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Fortunately, however, , 111 So.
Paul v. Nolen 166 So. 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
the owner of the premises, they found their action upon article 2322 of the Civil Code which makes “every owner of a building answerable in damages to any person who is injured — either while rightfully inside or while outside of the building — by an accident resulting either from the owner’s neglect to .repair the building or from a vice or defect in its original construction.” , 111 So.
Willis v. Cahn 164 So. 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Heath v. Suburban Building & Loan Ass'n 163 So. 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
267, 268 , we attempted, in the light of the Supreme Court’s , 111 So.
Estes v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co. 157 So. 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
670, 672 , and to Klein v. *398 Young, , 111 So.
Hanover v. Brady 148 So. 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933