Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Doiron v. Vacuum Oil Co., 115 So. 752.

23 citing documents.

Ratcliff v. Boydell 566 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Thomas v. Reliance Insurance Company 215 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
That is jurisdictional * *" , 115 So.
Martinolich v. Albert 143 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
565 , , the Court stated: "In this state laws in derogation of common right must be strictly construed and cannot be extended beyond their precise terms.
Southport Petroleum Co. v. Fithian 13 So. 2d 382 La. 1943
565 , ; Cole v. Schexnadire, 163 La.
Louisiana Highway Commission v. McCain 1 So. 2d 545 La. 1941
In Re Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. 169 So. 464 La. 1936
In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co. 167 So. 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
565 , .” That the bond is now in the possession of the city of New Iberia is of no importance, but requires explanation in view of what we said concerning the control of the bond at the time of the failure of the bank.
In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co. 161 So. 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
565 , .” “In this state it is well settled that privileges are granted only in pursuance of law and not from considerations of equity, and that the one who asserts a privilege has the burden of establishing it.
In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co. 160 So. 609 La. 1935
Anderson v. Harvey & Jones 154 So. 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
565 , ; Miller v. Bonner et al., 163 La.
Great Southern Lumber Co. v. James Stanton Const. Co. 151 So. 66 La. 1933
Dufrene v. Dufrene 149 So. 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Williams Gray v. Stewart 147 So. 103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1933
565 , ; State v. Miller, 169 La.
H. R. Hayes Lumber Co. v. McConnell 146 So. 14 La. 1932
General Lumber & Supply Co. v. Hunter 134 So. 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
565 , ; State v. Smith, 167 La.
Long Bell Lumber Co. v. S. D. Carr Const. Co. 133 So. 438 La. 1931
565 , and State v. Smith, 167 La.
Southern Gas Line, Inc. v. Dixie Oil Co. 133 So. 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Rester v. Moody & Stewart 130 So. 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
565 , , and State v. Smith, 167 La.
John H. Murphy Iron Works v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 124 So. 768 La. 1929
565 , , and once in the case of State v. Smith, 167 La.
Colonial Creosoting Co. v. Perry 124 So. 182 La. 1929
566 , , and which was approved in State et al. v. Smith, 167 La.
Brooks v. Byrd Clopton 122 So. 287 La. 1929
565 , ; State v. Smith, 167 La.
Board of Levee Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist. v. Hulse 120 So. 589 La. 1929
565 , ; Silver v. Harriss, 165 La.
State v. Smith 119 So. 56 La. 1928
565 , , and should not be disturbed.