Cited by

15 citing documents.

Brandon Wayne Osborn v. Juanita Howington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Spiers v. Roye 927 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Ogg v. Ferguson 521 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Sears, Roebuck and Company v. Guilbault 452 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Glover v. Hanks 396 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Anderson v. Lester 382 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
3rd Cir. 1963) stated: " So.
Smith v. UTILITY & MAINTENANCE CON. OF AMER., INC. 301 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
432, (1928); J. J. McDaniel & Co. v. L. H. Gardner & Co., 34 La.Ann.
Safety Finance Service, Inc. v. Nevett 270 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
But the writ of attachment is an extremely harsh remedy, and, when a party makes use of this powerful legal weapon he must be ready to respond in damages if it be found that the writ was wrongfully used.” So.
American Steel Building Co. v. Brezner 158 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Jacobs v. Calcasieu Frozen Foods, Inc. 118 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
Williams v. Credit Service Corporation 113 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
Hernandez v. Harson 111 So. 2d 320 La. 1959
Williams v. Ralph R. Miller Shows 17 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Harrison v. Atlas Signcrafts Co. 200 So. 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Blitz v. Guenin 187 So. 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939