Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Woolfarth, 127 So. 376.

58 citing documents.

Matte v. Continental Trailways, Inc. 278 So. 2d 60 La. 1973
95 , (1930); Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co., 150 La.
Payton v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 270 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Cary v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 250 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Schenker v. Randle 209 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
95 , ; Johnson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., .
Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc. 158 So. 2d 162 La. 1963
Landry v. Travelers Indemnity Company 155 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
95 , ; Wallace v. Shreveport Rys.
Johnson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 139 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
95 , ; Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co., 150 La.
Dixon v. Jenkins 139 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
95 , ; Roy v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., ; Ensminger v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., ; Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Hughes v. Baton Rouge Electric Co., La.App., 188 So.
Rebert v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 137 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Gunter v. State, Department of Highways 127 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
95 , ], was approved in Mays et al. v. Southwestern Gas & Elec.
Llorens v. City of Alexandria 106 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
95 , , to the extent that, in establishing its freedom from negligence as a cause of the breach of the contract of carriage, it was npt necessary for the carrier to affirmatively prove the exact cause of the breach.
Metoyer v. Sewerage & Water Board 100 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Quill v. Checker Cab Co. of New Orleans 100 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
95 , ; Ensminger v. New Orleans Public Service, La.App.1953, .
Weems v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 93 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Andrepont v. Ochsner 84 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
95 , , 378: "`Our conclusion is that the doctrine of the Hopkins, Spurlock, and LeBlanc cases [Hopkins v. New Orleans R. & L. Co., 150 La.
Rauscholb v. Continental Southern Lines, Inc. 81 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
95 , ; Dillon v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., 170 So.
Roy v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 76 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1954
95 , , it has been held in this State that “the burden of proof is on the carrier to show that it was free from any negligence which *427 might have caused the accident,” but that in showing this it is not necessary that the carrier show the actual cause, provided that “it does show that the injury occurred through no
Leigh v. Johnson-Evans Motors 75 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
Schmitt v. Algiers Public Service Co. 69 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
95 , , it has been established that a carrier, in order to free itself from liability to a passenger, must show that it was without fault which caused or contributed to the accident.
Wooten v. Thompson 69 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Meyer v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. 61 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
95 , , 378: "Our conclusion is that the doctrine of the Hopkins, Spurlock, and LeBlanc Cases is correct in so far as these cases hold that, where a passenger is injured, the burden of proof is on the carrier to show that it was free from any negligence which might have caused the accident, but that the doctrine of those ca
Marks v. Highway Ins. Underwriters 51 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
Burnett v. Yellow Cab Co. of Shreveport 50 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Brott v. Texas Pac. Ry. Co. 35 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
95 , , the Supreme Court of Louisiana laid down the rule that a carrier is not required to show how and why a passenger was injured to bar recovery.
Murphy v. Henderson 23 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
95 , ; Dillon v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.
Gross v. Teche Lines, Inc. 21 So. 2d 378 La. 1945
95 , ; Dillon v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., 170 So.
Bailey v. Owen 19 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Perret v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 17 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Pierce v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 8 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
95 , ; Gaines v. Teche Lines, La.App., 176 So.
Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 7 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
95 , ; Dillon v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., 170 So.
Valdry v. Baton Rouge Bus Co. 5 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
95 , ; Wallace v. Shreveport Rys.
Anderson v. City of Monroe 2 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
95 , , and Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Company, La.App., 175 So.
Fernandez v. Tri-State Transit Co. of Louisiana, Inc. 194 So. 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
95 , , and Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Co., La.App., 175 So.
Townley v. Pomes 191 So. 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Owens v. Monzingo 191 So. 581 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1939
95 , ; Wallace v. Shreveport Rys.
Hughes v. Baton Rouge Electric Co. 188 So. 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Gulf Ins. Co. v. Temple 187 So. 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Royal Ins. Co. v. Collard Motors, Inc. 179 So. 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Matteson v. Teche Greyhound Lines 178 So. 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
95, 97 , and Hart v. Gulf, Mobile & Northern R. R. Co., La.App., 167 So.
Gaines v. Teche Lines, Inc. 176 So. 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Wallace v. Shreveport Rys. Co. 175 So. 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
95 , , the court, in one respect, expressly modified the rule first announced in the Julien Case.
Peterson v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 174 So. 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
95 , ), and, while it is true that the burden of proof in such cases is on the carrier, if the facts are such as to indicate that the passenger had no knowledge of the cause of the accident (McGinn v. New Orleans Ry.
Gates v. Bisso Ferry Co. 172 So. 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
95, 97 , , and other cases.
Bynum v. City of Monroe 171 So. 116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
95 , ]” was reaffirmed and applied.
Dillon v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 170 So. 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
95 , , is that the carrier has the burden of showing that it was free from any negligence which might have caused injury to its passenger, but it is not required to show how and why the passenger was injured in order to bar recovery.
Wark v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 168 So. 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Hart v. Gulf, M. N. R. Co. 167 So. 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
95, 97 , ; Nee v. New Orleans Pub.
Alford v. Bisso Ferry Co. 161 So. 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Upton v. Bell Cabs, Inc. 154 So. 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
96 , ; Baptiste v. N. O. Public Service, Inc., 13 La.
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Benton 153 So. 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
95 , , plaintiff’s demand is rejected.