Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Isaacs v. Van Hoose, 131 So. 845.
-
AG Resource Management, LLC. and Agrifund, LLC v. Bunge North America, Inc. and Danny Allen Dickerson
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
Corp. v. LUBA, supra; So.
- Rebel Distributors Corp. v. Luba Workers' Comp. 144 So. 3d 825 La. 2013
- Dunaway v. Spain 468 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- Huval Tractor, Inc. v. Journet 413 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
- Pike Burden Printing, Inc. v. Pike Burden, Inc. 396 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Spalitta 321 So. 2d 338 La. 1975
- Ascension Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Martinez 308 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
-
Strunk Chain Saws, Inc. v. Williams
111 So. 2d 195
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
The opinion stated: *197 “We think in the present case defendants have clearly shown a discharge by payment of the debt, and that such was the intention of the parties * * The Supreme Court considered the issue of novation in Isaacs v. Van Hoose, 1930, , 131 So.
- Bonacorso v. Turnley 98 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
- Bank of Montgomery v. Reeves 50 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
- Fallo v. Kerner 12 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1943
- Moriarty v. Weiss 198 So. 643 La. 1939
-
Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Summons
177 So. 384
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Isaacs et al. v. Van Hoose, 171 La.676, .
- Wilkinson v. Adams 154 So. 630 La. 1934
-
Mills' Succession v. Manasseh
147 So. 77
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
670 , , as sustaining his contention of secondary responsibility after Waldron purchased the property.