Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Westwego Canal & Terminal Co. v. Pizanie, 142 So. 691.

20 citing documents.

Camel v. Waller 526 So. 2d 1086 La. 1988
15 (1932); Westwego Canal & , 142 So.
Lacour v. Crais 367 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Westwego Canal & , 142 So.
Benoit v. Acadia Fuel & Oil Distributors, Inc. 315 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Louisiana Civil Code Article 2266, American Creosote Company, Inc. v. Springer, supra; Westwego Canal & Terminal Co., , 142 So.
Loeb v. Badalamenti 192 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
596 ; Westwego Canal & , 142 So.
Newman v. McClure 134 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
596 ; Westwego Canal & Terminal Co., , 142 So.
Prevot v. Courtney 129 So. 2d 1 La. 1961
Westwego Canal & , 142 So.
Esso Standard Oil Company v. Jordan 92 So. 2d 377 La. 1956
Westwego Canal & , 142 So.
Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Marks 74 So. 2d 36 La. 1954
Lasyone v. Emerson 57 So. 2d 906 La. 1952
464, 504; Westwego Canal & , 142 So.
Lasyone v. Emerson 57 So. 2d 906 La. 1952
464, 504; Westwego Canal & , 142 So.
Meraux v. R. R. Barrow, Inc. 52 So. 2d 863 La. 1951
596 , and Westwego Canal & , 142 So.
Atkins v. Smith 21 So. 2d 728 La. 1945
464, 504; Westwego Canal & , 142 So.
Bell v. Canal Bank & Trust Co. 190 So. 359 La. 1939
Westwego Canal & Terminal Company, , 142 So.
Bell v. Canal Bank & Trust Co. 187 So. 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
In the case of Westwego Canal & , 142 So.
Buchler v. Fourroux 190 So. 640 La. 1939
In the case of Westwego Canal & , *573 1071, 142 So.
Masters v. Cleveland 162 So. 51 La. 1935
Masters v. Cleveland 158 So. 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Davis-Wood Lumber Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America 154 So. 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
In the case of Westwego Canal & Terminal Co., Inc., v. Pizanie et al., , 142 So.
Tharp v. Richardson 155 So. 239 La. 1934
As said by this court in the case of Westwego Canal & Terminal Co., Inc., v. Pizanie, , 142 So.
Lighting Fixture S. Co. v. Pacific Fire Ins. Co. 146 So. 35 La. 1932
If they are erected on the land, they are immovable *505 by their nature.” This ruling was quoted and approved by this court in the ease of Westwego Canal & Terminal Co., Inc., v. Paul Pizanie and Clarence Pizanie, , 142 So.