Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Land Co., 136 So. 91.

22 citing documents.

Darren Dugas v. Bayou Teche Water Works, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Dugas v. Bayou Teche Water Works, Inc. 153 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. Union Pacific Railroad 35 So. 3d 192 La. 2010
Steve H. Crooks and Era Lea Crooks v. Placid Refining Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Crooks v. Placid Refining Co. 903 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
VIDALIA v. Unopened Succession of Ruffin 663 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
City of New Orleans v. Condon 600 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
the court specifically stated that the taking of land for enlargement of a public park is for public use and constituted a valid basis for expropriation.
Terrebonne Parish Police Jury v. Kelly 472 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA ELECTRIC MEM. CORP. v. Duhon 313 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
The courts have rejected defendants' argument that a filing of the notice of lis pendens is a taking from which time interest accrues, , 136 So.
Marshall v. Caddo Parish Police Jury 252 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Ponder 204 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
State Ex Rel. Sabine River Authority v. Miller 198 So. 2d 397 La. 1967
Texas Pipe Line Company v. Stein 190 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Louisiana Highway Commission v. Davis 16 So. 2d 129 La. 1943
Sholars v. Louisiana Highway Commission 6 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
State Ex Rel. Porterie v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 182 So. 725 La. 1938
nds sought to be appropriated, we said (page 123) : “Their improvement for the avowed purpose of providing for the safety, health, and welfare of the inhabitants of the city of New Orleans is distinctly such a public benefit as justifies the appropriation of the lands for such purpose by the defendant levee board under its constitutional authority.” , 136 So.
State ex rel. Porterie v. Housing Authority 182 So. 725 La. 1938
ought to be appropriated, we said (page 123): “Their improvement, for the avowed purpose of providing for the safety, health, and welfare of the inhabitants of the city of New Orleans is distinctly such a public benefit as justifies the appropriation of the lands for such purpose by the defendant levee board under its constitutional authority.” *747 , 136 So.
City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Land Co. 136 So. 95 La. 1931
BRUNOT, , 1 of the docket of this court, this day decided, the judgment appealed from herein is affirmed.
City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Land Company 136 So. 94 La. 1931
BRUNOT, ,1 of the docket of this court, this day decided, the judgment appealed from herein is affirmed.
City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Land Company 136 So. 94 La. 1931
BRUNOT, ,1 of the docket of this court, this day decided, the judgment appealed from herein is affirmed.
City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Land Company 136 So. 94 La. 1931
BRUNOT, , 1 of the docket of this court, this day decided, the judgment appealed from herein is affirmed.
Barraco v. Barraco 136 So. 95 La. 1931
1 of the docket of this court, this day decided, the judgment appealed from herein is affirmed.