Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kern v. Southport Mill, Ltd., 141 So. 19.

167 citing documents.

Brumfield v. Patterson & Yeary Steel Co. 416 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Kern v. Southport Mill, [ ,] 141 So.
Laughlin v. City of Crowley 411 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
[6] See Lisonbee v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co., supra; Kern v. Southport Mill, Ltd., , 141 So.
Gordon v. National Union Fire Insurance 411 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
the result of some risk to which the employee is subjected in the course of his employment and to which he would not have been subjected had he not been so employed.” , 141 So.
Renfroe v. City of New Orleans 394 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Blakeway v. Lefebure Corp. 393 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Jackson v. American Insurance Co. 391 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Co., found that the accident arose out of and in the course of the decedent’s employment because the “employer’s business seems to be almost as much furthered by this supervised activity as was sitting under the tree in front of Mr. Buehler’s house on some hot afternoon when they had completely run out of things to do.” *1342 , 141 So.
DeVillier v. Highlands Ins. Co. 389 So. 2d 1133 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Wilson v. Evans Cooperage Co. 387 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Vickers v. Continental Southern Lines, Inc. 383 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Guidry v. Serigny 378 So. 2d 938 La. 1979
Whitney v. US Fid. & Guar. Ins. Co. 373 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Whitney v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance 373 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Guidry v. Serigny 370 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Minor v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance 356 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
23:1031 and 1221; , 141 So.
Quinney v. Maryland Casualty Co. 347 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Mitchell v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. 341 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
[ Kern v. Southport Mill, Limited, , 141 So.
Turner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company 339 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Hall v. Joiner 324 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Spain v. Travelers Indemnity Company 321 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Robbins v. Caraway-Rhodes Veterinary Hospital 299 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Vicknair v. SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSU. C. 292 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Fabre v. Travelers Insurance Company 286 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Kern vs. Southport Mill [ ], 141 So.
Jackson v. Long 289 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Davis v. Home Insurance Company 291 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
Lisonbee v. Chicago Mill and Lumber Company 278 So. 2d 5 La. 1973
Carney v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 277 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Quaglino v. Ace Bakery, Division of Lakeland Bakery, Inc. 275 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Jackson v. Lawler 273 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Constant v. State 272 So. 2d 675 La. 1973
Doss v. American Ventures, Inc. 261 So. 2d 615 La. 1972
Danos v. Great Acceptance Corp. 261 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
In support of its contention that he was within the course and scope of employment at the time of the accident, , 141 So.
Lisonbee v. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. 259 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
In further amplification of the statute, , 141 So.
Gautreaux v. Life Insurance Company of Georgia 256 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
Johnson v. McGehee Brothers Furniture Co. 256 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Lavier v. MacLellan 247 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
The basic leading case on the subject of "arising out of and in the course of" , 141 So.
Brown v. Hertz Corp. 246 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
256 (1917); and Kern v. *34 Southport Mill, , 141 So.
Smith v. Orleans Management Corporation 242 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
Boutte v. Mudd Separators, Inc. 236 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
Hull v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 236 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Criticized Francis v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation 225 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
The inappropriateness of attempting to use Myers ' "sufficiency" statement as a , 141 So.
Blade v. Mervis 226 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
As the requirement that, to entitle the employee to compensation, the accident must occur "in the course of" his employment simply means it must have taken place during the hours of employment and not at any other time ( , 141 So.
Johnson v. Wallace Industrial Constructors 224 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
The law applicable to a , 141 So.
Gorings v. Edwards 222 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
"The present facts also clearly meet the tests set forth in the following cases: Powell vs. Gold Crown Stamp Co., , Livingston vs. Henry & Hall, ; William vs. U. S. Casualty Co., ; Rogers vs. Aetna Casualty Co., ; Kern vs. Southport Mills [ ], 141 So.
Lewis v. Bellow 212 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
Powell v. Gold Crown Stamp Company 204 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
256, 258 ] The test prescribed in the landmark case of Kern v. Southport Mill, Ltd., , 141 So.
Jones v. Southern General Insurance 188 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Bates v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 186 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
In dealing with the closely related question of whether a specific set of facts "arise out of the employment” we find the test, which can be used as a guide line, although it is not a hard and fast rule, , 141 So.
Simmons v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 185 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
The general test to be applied, in determining whether the accident arose out of the employment, , 141 So.
Rogers v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company 173 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
256 , and Kern v. Southport Mill, Ltd., , 141 So.
Courville v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc. 174 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965