Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bradley v. Neill, 141 So. 382.
-
Staton v. Hutchinson
370 So. 2d 106
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
For cases not following Perez v. Cognevich, supra, So.
-
Cusimano v. O'Niell
192 So. 2d 147
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
In support of this contention, , 141 So.
- Folse v. Lafourche Democratic Committee 160 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
-
Love v. Cross
158 So. 2d 614
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
3 Cir., , 409: “ , 141 So.
- Timberlake v. Lindsey 140 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
- Herrin v. Reviere 106 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
-
Dowling v. Orleans Parish Democratic Committee
102 So. 2d 755
La. 1958
[10] A perusal of the decision of this Court relied on by the district judge as a basis for his ruling in rejecting the amendments to the petition and excluding the evidence, , 141 So.
-
Lewis v. Democratic Executive Committee
95 So. 2d 292
La. 1957
18:364) gives a candidate the right to maintain an election contest upon allegations of specific fraud and irregularities if he is able to show that, but for such fraud and irregularities, he would have received a majority of the legal votes cast, , 141 So.
- State v. Folse 17 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1944
-
Edwards v. Hester
17 So. 2d 820
La. 1944
The judge and the contestant, in their answers to the rule to show cause why the ballots in the five boxes referred to in the supplemental answer of the contestee should not be counted, , 141 So.
- Dumestre v. Fisher 195 So. 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
-
Landry v. Ozenne
195 So. 14
La. 1940
“In Bradley v. Neill [ ] 141 So.
-
Treadaway v. Plaquemines Parish Democratic Committee
193 So. 609
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1940
It is well settled that laws governing election contests are sui generis ( , 141 So.
-
Livaudais v. Leovy
193 So. 613
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1940
871 ; 20 C.J. Elections, § 324, p. 240, footnote 70.” In Bradley v. Neill, 1932, , 141 So.