Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bradley v. Neill, 141 So. 382.

14 citing documents.

  • Staton v. Hutchinson 370 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    For cases not following Perez v. Cognevich, supra, So.
  • Cusimano v. O'Niell 192 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    In support of this contention, , 141 So.
  • Folse v. Lafourche Democratic Committee 160 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Love v. Cross 158 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    3 Cir., , 409: “ , 141 So.
  • Timberlake v. Lindsey 140 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • Herrin v. Reviere 106 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
  • Dowling v. Orleans Parish Democratic Committee 102 So. 2d 755 La. 1958
    [10] A perusal of the decision of this Court relied on by the district judge as a basis for his ruling in rejecting the amendments to the petition and excluding the evidence, , 141 So.
  • Lewis v. Democratic Executive Committee 95 So. 2d 292 La. 1957
    18:364) gives a candidate the right to maintain an election contest upon allegations of specific fraud and irregularities if he is able to show that, but for such fraud and irregularities, he would have received a majority of the legal votes cast, , 141 So.
  • State v. Folse 17 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1944
  • Edwards v. Hester 17 So. 2d 820 La. 1944
    The judge and the contestant, in their answers to the rule to show cause why the ballots in the five boxes referred to in the supplemental answer of the contestee should not be counted, , 141 So.
  • Dumestre v. Fisher 195 So. 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
  • Landry v. Ozenne 195 So. 14 La. 1940
    “In Bradley v. Neill [ ] 141 So.
  • Treadaway v. Plaquemines Parish Democratic Committee 193 So. 609 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1940
    It is well settled that laws governing election contests are sui generis ( , 141 So.
  • Livaudais v. Leovy 193 So. 613 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1940
    871 ; 20 C.J. Elections, § 324, p. 240, footnote 70.” In Bradley v. Neill, 1932, , 141 So.