No. 32023. Precedential Processed

State v. Blache

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed October 31, 1932 · 144 So. 430

Cited by

KM, Inc. v. Weil Cleaners, Inc. 185 So. 3d 112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Good v. Saia 967 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Martin Timber Co. v. Pegues 715 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Quinn Properties v. Sabine River Realty 676 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Ergon, Inc. v. Allen 593 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Plunkett v. D & L Family Pharmacy, Inc. 562 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Metzinger v. Bundrick 503 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Newport-Nichols Enterprises v. Grimes, Austin & Stark, Inc. 463 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Prosperity Park, Inc. v. Britton 440 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Bickham v. Ogden 394 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Atkinson v. Richeson 393 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Housing Auth. of City of Lake Charles v. Minor 355 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978

all 24 citing documents »

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

State v. Hopkins 171 La. 919
Howard v. Cardella 132 So. 501
State v. Baurens 117 La. 136
State v. Fick 140 La. 1063
State v. Clark 144 La. 328
145 La. 914 not in our corpus
State v. Smith 83 So. 189
State v. Morel 146 La. 6
State v. David 83 So. 318

Opinion text

ST. PAUL, J. Relator was charged before the district court of Jefferson parish, sitting as a juvenile court, with failure to support and provide for his minor child, Albemarle Blache, Jr., residing in Jefferson parish. He challenged the jurisdiction of the court, on the ground that he himself resided and was domiciled in the parish of Orleans, and had so resided and been domiciled for some years before the alleged offense was committed. His plea was overruled, and in due course he was convicted; and he now applies to this court for relief, to wit, for a writ of prohibition forbidding the trial judge to proceed further. His plea should have been sustained; for “in cases of nonsupport of children, the offense by the father is committed at the place of his own domicile within the state, and not at the place of residence of the child.” State v. Hopkins, 171 La. 919 , 132 So. 501 , citing, State v. Baurens, 117 La. 136 , 41 So. 442 ; State v. Pick, 140 La. 1063 , 74 So. 554 ; State v. Clark, 144 La. 328 , 80 So. 578 ; State v. Smith, 145 La. 914 , 83 So. 189 ; State v. Morel, 146 La. 6 , 83 So. 318 . Decree. For the reasons assigned, the preliminary writ of prohibition herein issued is now made peremptory, and the relator is discharged, without prejudice, however, to the right of the state to proceed further against him before the proper tribunal in the parish of Orleans.