Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Blache, 144 So. 430.

24 citing documents.

  • KM, Inc. v. Weil Cleaners, Inc. 185 So. 3d 112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    720 , (1932); Martin Timber Co., Inc. v. Pegues, 30,361 (La.App.2d Cir.7/6/98), , writ denied, 98-2124 (La.12/11/98), .
  • Good v. Saia 967 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • Martin Timber Co. v. Pegues 715 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • Quinn Properties v. Sabine River Realty 676 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    720 , (1932), (rent was mailed on time, but was late due to faulty mail delivery); (La.App.
  • Ergon, Inc. v. Allen 593 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    720 , (1932), (rent was mailed on time, but was late due to faulty mail delivery); (La.
  • Plunkett v. D & L Family Pharmacy, Inc. 562 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    720 , (1932); Rudnick v. Union Producing Company, 209 La.
  • Metzinger v. Bundrick 503 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • Newport-Nichols Enterprises v. Grimes, Austin & Stark, Inc. 463 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    720 , (1932); Brewer v. Forrest Gravel Company, 172 La.
  • Prosperity Park, Inc. v. Britton 440 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    720 , (1932), we are cautioned that “it is improper, unless the whole law has been examined, to give judgment or advice upon a view of a single clause of it.” We are asked to review a record that leaves much to be desired.
  • Bickham v. Ogden 394 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Atkinson v. Richeson 393 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
  • Housing Auth. of City of Lake Charles v. Minor 355 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    720 , (1932) and cases therein cited.
  • Dorsa v. Parent 352 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    720 , (1932), which contains the language to that effect.
  • Baham v. Faust 333 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Himbola Manor Apartments v. Allen 315 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    720 , (1932) is cited as authority for this contention.
  • Jones v. Paul 254 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    720 , ; Leinhardt v. Marrero Land & Improvement Association, Ltd., (4th La.App.1962).
  • Smith Enterprises, Inc. v. Borne 245 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Farmers Gas Company v. LaHaye 195 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    720 , (1932); (2) that the lessors are estopped to demand cancellation by their conduct over the years in accepting rent long after its due date; and (3) that, in any event, cancellation of a lease is subject to judicial control according to the circumstances, and the equities in this case require that the lease be canceled
  • Lemoine v. Devillier 189 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    720 , ; Brewer v. Forest Gravel Company, 172 La.
  • DiFatta v. Campagna 157 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    720 , ; Saxton v. Para Rubber Co. of *634 Louisiana, 166 La.
  • Stassi v. La Hitte 40 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
  • Belvin v. Sikes 2 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    720 , , 431, the Saxton and Hemsing cases are referred to approvingly; and the court therein reaffirmed a principle firmly inbedded in our jurisprudence when it said: "Hence, although `it is true that ordinarily a lessor may dissolve a lease for failure on the part of the lessee to pay the rent promptly when due, (neverthel
  • State v. Borum 178 So. 371 La. 1937
  • Maestri v. Nall 145 So. 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    —, , the court referred with approval to Saxton v. Para Rubber Co., of La., and, again quoting the article of the Code, said: “The law prescribes that ‘payment must be made at the dwelling of the debtor.’ ” Plaintiff was within his rights in taking the action that he did, and, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and