Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Blache, 144 So. 430.
-
KM, Inc. v. Weil Cleaners, Inc.
185 So. 3d 112
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
720 , (1932); Martin Timber Co., Inc. v. Pegues, 30,361 (La.App.2d Cir.7/6/98), , writ denied, 98-2124 (La.12/11/98), .
- Good v. Saia 967 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
- Martin Timber Co. v. Pegues 715 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
-
Quinn Properties v. Sabine River Realty
676 So. 2d 639
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
720 , (1932), (rent was mailed on time, but was late due to faulty mail delivery); (La.App.
-
Ergon, Inc. v. Allen
593 So. 2d 438
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
720 , (1932), (rent was mailed on time, but was late due to faulty mail delivery); (La.
-
Plunkett v. D & L Family Pharmacy, Inc.
562 So. 2d 1048
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
720 , (1932); Rudnick v. Union Producing Company, 209 La.
- Metzinger v. Bundrick 503 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
-
Newport-Nichols Enterprises v. Grimes, Austin & Stark, Inc.
463 So. 2d 111
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
720 , (1932); Brewer v. Forrest Gravel Company, 172 La.
-
Prosperity Park, Inc. v. Britton
440 So. 2d 893
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
720 , (1932), we are cautioned that “it is improper, unless the whole law has been examined, to give judgment or advice upon a view of a single clause of it.” We are asked to review a record that leaves much to be desired.
- Bickham v. Ogden 394 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Atkinson v. Richeson 393 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
-
Housing Auth. of City of Lake Charles v. Minor
355 So. 2d 271
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
720 , (1932) and cases therein cited.
-
Dorsa v. Parent
352 So. 2d 258
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
720 , (1932), which contains the language to that effect.
- Baham v. Faust 333 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
-
Himbola Manor Apartments v. Allen
315 So. 2d 790
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
720 , (1932) is cited as authority for this contention.
-
Jones v. Paul
254 So. 2d 915
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
720 , ; Leinhardt v. Marrero Land & Improvement Association, Ltd., (4th La.App.1962).
- Smith Enterprises, Inc. v. Borne 245 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
-
Farmers Gas Company v. LaHaye
195 So. 2d 329
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
720 , (1932); (2) that the lessors are estopped to demand cancellation by their conduct over the years in accepting rent long after its due date; and (3) that, in any event, cancellation of a lease is subject to judicial control according to the circumstances, and the equities in this case require that the lease be canceled
-
Lemoine v. Devillier
189 So. 2d 694
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
720 , ; Brewer v. Forest Gravel Company, 172 La.
-
DiFatta v. Campagna
157 So. 2d 633
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
720 , ; Saxton v. Para Rubber Co. of *634 Louisiana, 166 La.
- Stassi v. La Hitte 40 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
-
Belvin v. Sikes
2 So. 2d 65
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
720 , , 431, the Saxton and Hemsing cases are referred to approvingly; and the court therein reaffirmed a principle firmly inbedded in our jurisprudence when it said: "Hence, although `it is true that ordinarily a lessor may dissolve a lease for failure on the part of the lessee to pay the rent promptly when due, (neverthel
- State v. Borum 178 So. 371 La. 1937
-
Maestri v. Nall
145 So. 128
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
—, , the court referred with approval to Saxton v. Para Rubber Co., of La., and, again quoting the article of the Code, said: “The law prescribes that ‘payment must be made at the dwelling of the debtor.’ ” Plaintiff was within his rights in taking the action that he did, and, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and