Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jackson v. Cook, 181 So. 195.
-
Broussard v. Thompson
128 So. 2d 477
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
The court in applying the doctrine of last clear chance ( , 181 So.
-
Martin v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark
127 So. 2d 328
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
153 ; Jackson v. Cook, 1938, , 181 So.
- Knighten v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 127 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
-
Gallioto v. Chisholm
126 So. 2d 63
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1960
See Alvares v. Rush, La.App., ; Lervick v. White Top Cabs, Inc., La.App., ; , 181 So.
- Franicevich v. Lirette 124 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
- McCarthy v. Blair 122 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
-
Boyd v. Sutton
120 So. 2d 350
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
960 , , 197: “ * * * the well-recognized and settled rule that the duty of those in charge of motor cars and engines to look ahead and observe never ceases; that what they can see they must see and in legal contemplation they do see; that their failure to see what they could have seen by the exercise of due diligence does n
- Madison v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 120 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
- McCandless v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. 120 So. 2d 501 La. 1960
- Spiers v. Consolidated Companies, Inc. 125 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
-
Sixkiller v. Prechter
118 So. 2d 698
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
This case is not analogous to any cited by counsel for the present plaintiffs, , 181 So.
- Zachery v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 116 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Schellang v. Demuth 115 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Moore v. Shreveport Transit Company 115 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
- Wells v. Meshell 115 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
- Benjamin v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 113 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Newton v. Pacillo 111 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
- Henderson v. Central Mutual Insurance 111 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Short v. City of Baton Rouge 110 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Alvares v. Rush 108 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
- Platt v. Scarborough 108 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
- Barrett v. Houston Fire & Casualty Co. 108 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1959
- Vail v. Spampinato 108 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
- Simoneaux v. State, Department of Highways 106 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
- Lejeune v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 107 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
- Sampson v. Roberts 105 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
-
Joffre v. Ike Haggert MacHine Works
100 So. 2d 557
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
A short time later, , 181 So.
- McElveen v. Gant 102 So. 2d 477 La. 1958
- Bourgeois v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 102 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
-
Watson v. McEacharn
99 So. 2d 138
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
In such cases the last clear chance doctrine applies even though plaintiff’s negligence continues up to the accident.” In explanation and amplification of its ruling in the Rottman case, , 181 So.
- Frazier v. Muse 98 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
-
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co.
96 So. 2d 340
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
In Jackson v. Cook, 1938, , 181 So.
- Tauzier v. Bondio 95 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
- Lacy v. Bullard 95 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
- Arnold v. Reuther 92 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1957
- Belshe v. Gant 92 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
- Crosby v. Brown Oil Tools 92 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
- Brooks v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 91 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
-
Watkins v. Strickland Transportation Co.
90 So. 2d 561
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
In brief and oral argument appellants strongly rely on the holding in Jackson v. Cook, 1938, , 181 So.
- Carlson v. Fidelity Mutual Insurance 88 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
-
Guillory v. Lemoine
87 So. 2d 798
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
This defendant is presumed to have seen what he should have seen, , 181 So.
- Chouest v. Remont 81 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
- Heindel v. Transcontinental Insurance Co. of Hartford, Conn. 82 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
- Micklich v. General Lloyds Fire & Casualty Co. 81 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
-
Montault v. Bradford
79 So. 2d 601
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
153 , and Jackson v. Cook, 1938, , 181 So.
- Mansfield v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 78 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
- Peranio v. Superior Insurance Company 76 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
- Deck v. Page 77 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
-
Whittey v. Locascio
76 So. 2d 455
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
* * * ” Later, , 181 So.
- Moore v. Moran 74 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954