Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Landry v. Ozenne, 195 So. 14.

22 citing documents.

Explained Higginbotham v. Morris 749 So. 2d 840 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Kelly v. Village of Greenwood 363 So. 2d 887 La. 1978
Fontenot v. Lee 348 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Moreau v. Tonry 339 So. 2d 3 La. 1976
LaCaze v. Johnson 310 So. 2d 86 La. 1974
rise to fraud or which cast uncertainty on the result, irregularities in an election will not affect the validity of a nomination or serve to nullify the result...; but the rule is otherwise if a contestant is able to show, upon allegations of specific fraud and irregularities, that but for such fraud and irregularities he would have received a majority of the legal votes cast ( , 195 So.
Allen v. Gleason 293 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
769 ); but the rule is otherwise if a contestant is able to show, upon allegations of specific fraud and irregularities, that but for such fraud and irregularities he would have received a majority of the legal votes cast ( , 195 So.
Garrison v. Connick 291 So. 2d 778 La. 1974
769 ); but the rule is otherwise if a contestant is able to show, upon allegations of specific fraud and irregularities, that but for such fraud and irregularities he would have received a majority of the legal votes cast ( , 195 So.
Garrison v. Connick 288 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Keating v. St. John the Baptist Parish Democratic Executive Committee 265 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
The court cited Landry v. Ozenne, et al, , 195 So.
Gremillion v. Rinaudo 240 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Newlin v. Jefferson Parish Council ex rel. Schouest 146 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Appellant further contends that there is a universal prima facie presumption of the correctness and regularity of the official promulgation, , 195 So.
Timberlake v. Lindsey 140 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
State ex rel. Langridge v. Harris 138 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1962
Downs v. Pharis 122 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Parish of Caddo 120 So. 2d 262 La. 1960
481 (irregularity in the list of registered voters used); , 195 So.
Smith v. Washington Parish Democratic Committee 120 So. 2d 257 La. 1960
Dowling v. Orleans Parish Democratic Committee 102 So. 2d 755 La. 1958
769 ); but the rule is otherwise if a contestant is able to show, upon allegations of specific fraud and irregularities, that but for such fraud and irregularities he would have received a majority of the legal votes cast ( , 195 So.
Lewis v. Democratic Executive Committee 95 So. 2d 292 La. 1957
Daigle v. Mayor of Rayne 62 So. 2d 833 La. 1953
State v. Folse 17 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1944
Dumestre v. Fisher 195 So. 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
350 , and in Landry v. Ozenne, La.Sup., , decided March 12, 1940.
Bell v. Guenard 195 So. 504 La. 1940
350 ; and Landry v. Ozenne, La.Sup., , decided March 12, 1940.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by