Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vinzant, 7 So. 2d 917.

74 citing documents.

Lirette Neville, Individually and on Behalf of Her Late Son, Tristen Edgerson (D) v. Lcmc Health Holdings, Inc. … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Isiah Cole Jr. and His Wife, Karen Cole v. New Orleans Emergency Medical Services, City of New Orleans, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
7/5/94), So.2d 917 (1942) (citation omitted).
Joseph Celestine v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government and Abc Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
1 Cir. 1980) ( So.2d 917 (1942)).
Edith Terry as the Designated Heir to the Survival Action Concerning Rosie Tardieff's Injury and for the Wrongful … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
2d 216, 219-220, the Supreme Court provided the following definitions of “gross negligence”: Gross negligence has been defined as the “want of even slight care and diligence” and the “want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.” So.2d 917 (La.
Brian Mariana and Zachary Mariana Versus Magnolia Auto Transport, LLC, Hallmark Specialty Insurance Company, Nickolus Treadway, Usaa Casualty … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
7/5/94), -220, the Supreme Court stated: Gross negligence has been defined as the “want of even slight care and diligence” and the “want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.” So.2d 917 (La.
Virginia Banks Listach, as tutor of, and on behalf of, the minor child, Fatima Akasha Banks, and Timothy … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
2d 216, 219, quoting, So.
James Wagner v. DA Exterminating Company of St. Tammany, Inc. and LIPCA, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
7/ 5/ 94), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that "[ g] ross negligence has been defined as the ` want of even slight care and diligence' and the want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise"', So.
Inzinna v. Guitreau 272 So. 3d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Washington v. Onebeacon Am. Ins. Co. 265 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Gerald Janise v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
It is the want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.” So.2d 917 (1942).
Janise v. Acadian Ambulance Serv., Inc. 244 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Vinzant , , (1942).
Gwendolyn Martin v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
It is the want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.” So.2d 917 (1942).
Draughn Koonce v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
a, the fourth circuit explained: Gross negligence has been defined by the Louisiana Supreme Court as “‘want of even slight care and diligence’ and the ‘want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.’“ Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dep't Ambulance Serv., 93–3099, p. 4 (La.7/5/94), So.2d 917 (La.1942).
Koonce v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 172 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
rcumstances post-Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the fourth circuit explained: Gross negligence has been defined by the Louisiana Supreme Court as “ ‘want of even slight care and diligence’ and the ‘want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.’” Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dep’t Ambulance Serv., 93-3099, p. 4 (La.7/5/94)
Sandrock v. St. Bernard Parish Government 171 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Gross negligence has been defined by the Louisiana Supreme Court as “ ‘want of even slight care and diligence’ and the ‘want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.’ ” Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dep’t Ambu *1044 lance Serv., 93-3099, p. 4 (La.7/5/94), , , .
Citron v. Gentilly Carnival Club, Inc. 165 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Gross negligence has been defined as the “want of even slight care and diligence” and the “want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.” Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110 and 93-3112 (La.7/5/94)
State v. Miller 160 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
905, 911-912 , (1946); , State v. Bessa, 115 La.
Jones v. American Alternative Insurance Corp. 169 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
It is the want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.” , (1942).
Billups v. B.C. Enterprise Group, Inc. 104 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, and 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), -220 , , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that “Louisiana courts have frequently addressed the concept of gross negligence” and that “[g]ross negligence has been defined as the ‘want of even slight care and diligence’ and the ‘want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.
DeLafosse v. Village of Pine Prairie 998 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Tonya Ardoin Delafosse v. Village of Pine Prairie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1/15/02), So.2d 917 (1942).
Rabalais v. Nash 952 So. 2d 653 La. 2007
Foshee v. LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU CAS. INS. 948 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Brooks v. City of Jennings 944 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Kathi Brooks v. City of Jennings La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
It is the want of that diligence which even careless 36 men are accustomed to exercise.” So.2d 37 917 (1942).
Ceasar v. Hebert 926 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Irving Ceasar v. Sheriff Sid Hebert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
It is the want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.’ So.2d 917 (1942).” Richard v. Miller, 03-1448, p. 4 (La.App.
Brown v. Lee 929 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
In Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, and 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), -220 , , (La.
Pierre v. ZULU SOCIAL AID & PLEASURE CLUB 885 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
In Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Department Ambulance Service, 93-3099, 93-3110, and 93-3112 (La.7/5/94), -220 , , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that "Louisiana courts have frequently addressed the concept of gross negligence" and that "[g]ross negligence has been defined as the `want of even slight care and diligence' and the `want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.
Robert Troy Richard v. Karl M. Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
It is the want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.” So.2d 917 (1942).
Richard v. Miller 867 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Watson v. Bulloch 868 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
It is the want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.” , (1942).
Freeman v. Tate 847 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Brown 849 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
(1942), wherein defendant alleged that his conviction for manslaughter before a jury of five was a nullity.
Lenard v. Dilley 805 So. 2d 175 La. 2002
Binkley v. Landry 811 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Gross negligence has been defined as the “want of even slight care and diligence” and the “want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.”
Kyser v. Metro Ambulance, Inc. 764 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Holloway v. Midland Risk Ins. Co. 759 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Schell v. K & K Ins. Group, Inc. 756 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Edmundson Bros. v. Montex Drilling Co. 731 So. 2d 1049 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc. 725 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Gross negligence has been defined as the “want of even slight care and diligence” and the “want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.”
Sportsman Store v. SONITROL SEC. SYSTEMS 725 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Haynes v. Calcasieu Medical Transp., Inc. 702 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Todd v. STATE, THROUGH DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES 699 So. 2d 35 La. 1997
Mullins v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 697 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Theriot v. Bourg 691 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
the want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise" , (La.App.
Tudor Chateau Creole Apartments Partnership v. D.A. Exterminating Co. 691 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Gross negligence has been defined as the “want of even slight care and diligence” and the “want of that diligence which even careless men are accustomed to exercise.”
Orlando v. Corps De Napoleon 687 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Marceaux v. Gibbs 680 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv. 639 So. 2d 216 La. 1994