Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Le Blanc v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 13 So. 2d 245.
- Kaylonna Dotson v. Darren Balsamo and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
-
Margaret C. Camalo v. Patricia Laura Estrada Courtois
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Co., So.2d 245 4 (1943).
-
Raines v. Columbia Lakeland Medical Center
923 So. 2d 170
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
763 (1922); , (1943), citing Layne v. Louisiana Power Light Co., 164 So.
-
Smith v. Quarles Drilling Co.
885 So. 2d 562
La. 2004
763 (1922); , (1943), citing Layne v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. , 164 So.
- Turner v. Ostrowe 828 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-
King v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co.
782 So. 2d 1104
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
at 93 , , (1943); Soprano v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 246 La.
-
Arthur v. Zapata Haynie Corp.
690 So. 2d 86
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Co., , (1943); father-son immunity, Deshotel v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 257 La.
-
Martin v. Champion Ins. Co.
656 So. 2d 991
La. 1995
524 , (holding liability insurer liable for legal interest on policy limits from date of judicial demand); , (holding liability insurer liable for legal interest on policy limits from date of judicial demand).
-
McWright v. Modern Iron Works, Inc.
567 So. 2d 707
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Rozas, supra; , (1943); Smith v. Western Preferred Cas.
-
Remedies v. Lopez
560 So. 2d 118
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
524 , (1964); , (1943); (La.App.
- McGowan v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 555 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- Burton v. Foret 498 So. 2d 706 La. 1986
-
Monte v. H.B. "Buster" Hughes, Inc.
457 So. 2d 30
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Co., , (1943).- That statute provides interest from judicial demand “on all judgments, sounding in damages, ‘ex delicto’,” and does not purport to apply to workers’ compensation cases.
- Auger v. Auger 434 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
-
Danzy v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
380 So. 2d 1356
La. 1980
Co., , (1943); father-son immunity, Deshotel v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 257 La.
-
Travelers Indem. Co. v. Reserve Ins. Co.
364 So. 2d 1041
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
In LeBlanc v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. [ ], (1943), the court considered a clause limiting the insurer's liability to interest accruing from date of judgment only.
-
O'DONNELL v. Fidelity General Ins. Co.
344 So. 2d 91
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
524 , (1964); , (1943); (La.App.
- Callais v. Allstate Insurance Co. 334 So. 2d 692 La. 1976
-
Gremillion v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
302 So. 2d 712
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
As to State Farm's contention that Mrs. Gremillion cannot recover against State Farm because she could not recover against her husband, the trial court held that the plea of interspousal immunity or coverture is a personal defense between husband and wife and not available to the insurer in a direct action brought by the wife against the insurer, , (1943); and Dowden v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins.
-
Jagers v. Royal Indemnity Company
276 So. 2d 309
La. 1973
191 ], and LeBlanc v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. [ , ], both cited above."
- Wooten v. Wimberly 254 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Roubion 252 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
- Deshotel v. Travelers Indemnity Company 243 So. 2d 259 La. 1971
- Orgeron v. Earl Gibbon Transport, Inc. 235 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Jefferson Downs, Inc. v. American General Ins. Co. 214 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
-
Drude v. Ryals
216 So. 2d 647
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
The leading cases on this subject are as follows: O’Brien v. Traders and General Insurance Company, La.App., , , .
- Doty v. Central Mutual Insurance Company 186 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
-
Loubat v. Audubon Life Insurance Company
177 So. 2d 281
La. 1965
383 , , involved an ordinary "rider” which qualified certain conditions of the insurance contract and was attached to the policy (apparently, incidentally, at the time it was issued).
- Loubat v. Audubon Life Insurance Company 170 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
- Terro v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 169 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
-
Soprano v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
165 So. 2d 308
La. 1964
13:4203 to the *539 effect that “Legal interest shall attach from date of judicial demand, on all judgments, sounding in damages, ‘ex delicto’, which may be rendered by any of the courts.” , (1943), where, considering a like contention, the court held that, although the direct action statute at that time (Act 55 of 1930,.
-
Bruno v. American Employers Insurance
164 So. 2d 63
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Co, , , cited by Plaintiff.
-
Soprano v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
155 So. 2d 287
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Thus, , , our Supreme Court stated: “Where a policy of insurance provides for interest at a lesser rate or for a shorter term, than the law fixes, it is in contravention of law.” *292 Similarly, in Woodward v. Tillman, La.
-
Plauche v. Consolidated Companies
105 So. 2d 269
La. 1958
13:4203 , legal interest accrues as a matter of right from date of judicial demand on actions ex delicto and hence legal interest should be allowed from June 18, 1955.
-
Reeves v. State
80 So. 2d 206
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
In later construing this statute, the Supreme Court, through the present Chief Justice, , , stated: "`The language of the statute is mandatory and declares that all judgments shall bear interest from date of judicial demand, and this is true though the litigant does not demand it, or the judgment so provides.
-
Woodward v. Tillman
82 So. 2d 121
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Id., La.App., , where the court held mandatory the legislative provision that in damage suits "Legal interest shall attach from date of judicial demand", LSA-R.S.
-
Chapman v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
45 So. 2d 557
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
in which is stated: "Furthermore, the plea of inter-spousal immunity, available to the husband in defeating any recovery sought by his wife for injuries sustained by her through his negligent operation of an automobile, is personal to him and, therefore, not available to the insurer of the husban