DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Younger, 20 So. 2d 305.

14 citing documents.

  • Foster v. Breaux 270 So. 2d 526 La. 1972
    He is “required by law” to do so, , (1944), since otherwise he would waive his right to question the venue.
  • Bielkiewicz v. Insurance Company of North America 201 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    221 , , syllabus 10; , , syllabus 9; Schwing v. Dunlap, 125 La.
  • Mexic Bros., Inc. v. Sauviac 191 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    (1944), that because of the amendment other dilatory exceptions could be filed with an exception to citation without waiving the objection to jurisdiction.
  • Gillan v. Jones 157 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
  • Continental Casualty Co. v. Ramon 151 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    2293, 2301, 2311, 2312, 2313 and 2452; , ; Kramer v. Freeman, 198 La.
  • Hungerford v. Hungerford 121 So. 2d 226 La. 1960
    * * * ” Further, in the Garig case, by means of a per curiam issued in connection with an *228 , in which exceptions had been filed in the alternative with proper reservation, we observed: “In the Younger case, unlike the case at bar, the exceptions were filed ‘only in the alternative, with full reservation of and without waiving his exception to the jurisdiction of the court, and solely for the pu
  • Devoe & Raynolds Co. v. Robinson 109 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
  • Babers v. Jolly 107 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    But Plaquemines parish is not the domicile of either one of these joint obligors, and the only jurisdiction which it obtained against the other joint obligor (to wit, Rose), was by virtue of the attachment levied against him as a nonresident.” Likewise, in point is State v. Younger, 1944, , 20 So,2d 305.
  • Dupre v. Consolidated Underwriters 99 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
  • Evangeline Iron Works v. Lyons 96 So. 2d 578 La. 1957
  • Standard Indemnity, Inc. v. Albrought 81 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    it has been held, therefore, that filing a declinatory exception such as to the jurisdiction ratione personnae or to the citation at the same time as other dilatory exceptions does not waive the exception to jurisdiction or citation, when the other exceptions are filed only in the alternative and with full reservation of and without waiving the aforesaid declinatory exceptions, , , noted in 19 Tulane Law Review 460.
  • Mitchell v. Gulf States Finance Corp. 78 So. 2d 3 La. 1955
    117 , , , , relied on by the defendant here, and in a Per Curiam pointed out that “In the Younger case, unlike the case at bar, the exceptions were filed ‘only in the alternative, with full reservation of and without waiving his exception to the jurisdiction of the court, and solely for the purpose of complying w
  • George W. Garig Transfer, Inc. v. Harris 75 So. 2d 28 La. 1954
    569 , , , wherein “this Court unequivocably held that, by virtue of Act 124 of 1936, the exception to the jurisdiction ratione personae is not waived if coupled in the alternative with other dilatory or declinatory exceptions * * In the Younger case, unlike the case at bar, the exceptions were filed “only in th
  • Reich v. Reich 23 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945