DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Keller v. Haas, 24 So. 2d 610.

19 citing documents.

  • Allen v. Allen 648 So. 2d 359 La. 1994
  • Professional Occupational Therapy Services, Inc. v. Vanco Human Services, Inc. 572 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    486 , (1943), affirmed , (1945).
  • Harris v. Best of America Inc. 466 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    486 , (1943), affirmed , (1945).
  • City of New Orleans v. Treen 421 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    (1946); Gravier v. Gravier, 200 La.
  • Succession of Campbell 243 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
    (1945); Murphy et al. v. Murphy, 136 La.
  • Johnson v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company 236 So. 2d 216 La. 1970
    *297 , (1946); Gravier v. Gravier, 200 La.
  • White v. White 233 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    661 ; , ; Hodgeson v. McDaniel, 233 La.
  • Guilbeau v. Jeanerette Lumber & Shingle Co. 232 So. 2d 67 La. 1970
    486 , , , ; Hake v. Lee, 106 La.
  • Guilbeau v. Jeanerette Lumber & Shingle Co. 219 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    * * * ” , , the fractional interests of the co-owners were separately assessed, but, nevertheless, the Supreme Court followed the rule of law that, generally, as between co-owners, a sale to one of them for delinquent taxes amounts to' payment of taxes and inures to the benefit of all co-owners.
  • Malabar Corp. v. Warren Realty Co. 209 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
  • Succession of Caldwell 147 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • Thompson v. Bradley 142 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1962
    (1945), the Supreme Court quoted with approval from the Doiron case as follows: “ ‘The supplementary contention of plaintiffs that the possession of the tax purchaser was the possession of all the co-owners, suspending prescription, and that its purchase inured to the benefit of all the co-owners, was c
  • Newman v. McClure 134 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • Ewald v. Hodges 120 So. 2d 465 La. 1960
    He can avail himself of the Constitutional peremption.” See, , ; Robinson v. Commercial Cattle Co. [La.App.], ; Hodgeson v. McDaniel, 233 La.
  • Hodgeson v. McDaniel 96 So. 2d 481 La. 1957
  • Robinson v. Commercial Cattle Co. 82 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    486 , , Id., , , that the purchase at tax sale by the defendant company constituted the purchase by one co-tenant of the interest of another co-tenant, which operated only as a payment of the taxes and did not constitute a divesture of title, provided the right of redemption was exercised by the co-tenant within a rea
  • Bridges v. Trevino 64 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    Their long acquiescence has ratified the tax purchase by their co-owner, and they have lost the right to assert that he purchased for the account of all.” , 24 So.
  • Newman v. McClure 62 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
  • Robertson v. Grigsby 41 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    there is no constitutional or statutory law governing the rights of the parties in cases of this sort and the Court must be guided by the principles of equity and prior decisions in similar cases.