Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Williams v. Williams, 31 So. 2d 170.

32 citing documents.

Hawkins v. Hawkins 592 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
665 (1939); Williams v. Williams, supra [ , (1947) ], except in certain instances where the award is terminated by operation of law.
Tureaud v. Tureaud 427 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
2d Cir.1979), it was stated that a suit to make past due alimony executory is not a suit simply for a money judgment or debt, but is an incident of the original divorce or separation proceeding which ordered the alimony payable
Goldstein v. Goldstein 409 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
" , , is dispositive of the issue in this case.
McGovern v. Tatman 410 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
793 ; , ; Gehrkin v. Gehrkin, 216 La.
Marshall v. Marshall 390 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Williams v. Williams 371 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Vernon v. Leger 363 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
793 ; , ; Gehrkin v. Gehrkin, 216 La.
Halcomb v. Halcomb 352 So. 2d 1013 La. 1977
793 ; , ; Gehrkin v. Gehrkin, 216 La.
Miller v. Miller 321 So. 2d 318 La. 1975
The Court based its holding upon the premise that a suit to make past due alimony executory is nothing more than a proceeding to judicially fix the amount due and executory under the original judgment, , (1947); Snow v. Snow, 188 La.
Whitt v. Vauthier 316 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Mertens v. Mertens 308 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Hastings v. Dinning 308 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Official Revision Comment (a) under Article 3945 states that this codifies the jurisprudence recognizing the right to proceed by rule to determine the amount of alimony in arrears, , (1947).
Simon v. Calvert 289 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Anthony v. Anthony 288 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
is dispositive of the issue in this case.
Odum v. Odum 273 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
2d 226 ; Allen v. Allen, La.App., 136 So.2d *579 168; , .
Duplechan v. Duplechan 270 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
950 , ; , ; Snow v. Snow, 188 La.
Adams v. Adams 243 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Rodriguez v. Rodriguez 245 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
862 , ; , ; Elchinger v. Elchinger, La.App., ; Allen v. Allen, La.App., .
Bell v. Bell 225 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
862 , ; , ; Elchinger v. Elchinger, La.
Coleman v. Coleman 209 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
Granger v. Granger 193 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
950 , ; , ; Snow v. Snow, 188 La.
Vinet v. Vinet 184 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
862 , ; , ; Elchinger v. Elchinger, La.App., ; Allen v. Allen, La.App., .
De La Bretonne v. De La Bretonne 164 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
862 , ; , ; Gehrkin v. Gehrkin, 216 La.
Dunham v. Dunham 162 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
793 ; Williams v. Williams, [ ] 30 [31] So.2d 170; Gehrkin v. Gehrkin [ 216 La.
Hebert v. Hebert 159 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
950 , ; , ; Snow v. Snow, 188 La.
Dupuis v. Patin 155 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
793 ; , ; Gehrkin v. Gehrkin, 216 La.
Viser v. Viser 146 So. 2d 409 La. 1962
Miller v. Miller, 207 La.
Arabie v. Arabie 89 So. 2d 890 La. 1956
a similar case, we said: “ * * * The use of the rule to make the delinquent payments execuutory was conformable to a method of *1041 practice which has been sanctioned by our courts in numerous cases.
Pisciotto v. Crucia 71 So. 2d 226 La. 1954
793 ; , ; Gehrkin v. Gehrkin, 216 La.
Wainwright v. Wainwright 46 So. 2d 902 La. 1950
793 ; , ; Gehrkin v. Gehrkin, 216 La.
Gehrkin v. Gehrkin 45 So. 2d 89 La. 1950
793, 801 , this court, after an exhaustive review of the jurisprudence on the subject, announced its conclusion that the district judge, in that case, “was right in maintaining that he had no authority to release the defendant from his debt 'for the past-due installments of alimony.” , .
Gehrkin v. Gehrkin 45 So. 2d 89 La. 1950