Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carrere v. Orleans Club, 37 So. 2d 715.

13 citing documents.

Robinson v. City of New Orleans 247 So. 3d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See also Carrere v. Orleans Club , , 312-13, , 719 (1948) (finding the exclusion inapplicable to an club "chiefly engaged in serving teas, luncheons, and dinners that are attended almost exclusively by members and their occasional guests").
Mac Normand v. Village of Hessmer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Normand v. VILLAGE OF HESSMER 18 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Lozes v. Waterson 513 So. 2d 1155 La. 1987
we indicated that a zoning ordinance, being in derogation of rights of private ownership and curtailing and limiting the use of property, must be strictly construed in favor of the property owner, and where exemptions appear in favor of a property owner, these exemptions should be liberally c
Little Giant Food Stores, Inc. v. STATE, ETC. 416 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
(1948); Cendon v. H. G. Hill Stores, 171 La.
City of West Monroe v. OUACHITA ASS'N, ETC. 402 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
251 , (1963); , (1948); (La.App.
Rundell v. May 258 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
(1948), and City of New Orleans v. Buffa (La.App.Orl.1953) .
City of Crowley v. Prejean 173 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Gautreau v. Board of Electrical Examiners 167 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
the interpretation of municipal authorities with respect to a municipal zoning ordinance was held entitled to great weight.
Wright v. DeFatta 152 So. 2d 10 La. 1963
City of New Orleans v. Leeco, Inc. 76 So. 2d 387 La. 1954
587 , ; Carrere v. Orleans Club, 1948, , ; Berteau v. Police Jury of Parish of Ascension, 1949, 214 La.
Rabalais v. Hillary Builders 62 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
1068 , , , holding with this contention of defendant.
State Ex Rel. Prats v. City Planning & Zoning Com'n 59 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1952
In applying that rule, , , that exemptions in favor of an owner must be liberally construed.