Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Simpson v. Salter, 31 So. 2d 163.

23 citing documents.

Kathy Prejean v. Walter Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
182, 320 -66 (La.1975) (citations and footnote omitted) stated: While the trial court remains the original forum for resolving factual and legal issues, the Louisiana Constitution expressly extends the jurisdiction of appellate courts in civil cases to the review of facts as well as law.
In Re Adoption of BGS 556 So. 2d 545 La. 1990
(1947); Adoption of Edwards, (La.App.
Powell v. Barsavage 399 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Ingargiola v. Clesi 396 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
(1947); State ex rel Martin v. Talbot, 161 La.
Cawthorne v. Williams 313 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
Wilson v. Wilson 307 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
Wren v. Wren 301 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
State in Interest of Taylor 296 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
Wood v. Beard 290 So. 2d 675 La. 1974
Borras v. Falgoust 285 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Griffith v. Roy 269 So. 2d 217 La. 1972
In Re Spraggins 234 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
and it was said in a footnote in Green v. Paul, 212 La.
State ex rel. Tusa v. Tusa 221 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Simpson v. Salter [ , ] and State ex rel.
In re Adoption of Bickerstaff 190 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
940 , ; , ; and it was said in a footnote in Green v. Paul, 212 La.
Smith v. Smith 179 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
In Re Hughes 176 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
(1947), which had held consent of the parent must continue to the final decree of adoption, reaffirmed its position that there can be no adoption without this continuing consent.
State ex rel. Raborn v. Bergeron 176 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
State ex rel. Paul v. Department of Welfare 166 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
State ex rel. Rothrock v. Webber 155 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Simpson, et al. v. Salter, et al. [ ], (Sup.Ct.
In Re Ackenhausen 154 So. 2d 380 La. 1963
and it was said in a footnote in Green v. Paul, 212 La.
In Re Byrd 75 So. 2d 331 La. 1954
is, as stated in Green v. Paul, authority that continuing consent of natu *201 ral parents is a requisite for a final decree of adoption, then it should likewise be overruled.
State Ex Rel. Martin v. Garza 46 So. 2d 760 La. 1950
State Ex Rel. Terry v. Nugent 31 So. 2d 834 La. 1947
is not in conflict with the views expressed herein.