DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Koob v. Cooperative Cab Co., 35 So. 2d 849.

95 citing documents.

  • DeRosier v. South Louisiana Contractors 583 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    (1948); see also, Henderson v. Central Mutual Insurance Co., 238 La.
  • Valin v. Barnes 550 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    Koob v. Cooperative Cab Company, supra [ , (1948) ]; Bourgeois v. Francois, 245 La.
  • Holland v. Home Insurance Co. 396 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    and Duchmann v. Allstate Ins.
  • Palmer v. State 393 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    (1948), at page 851, stated the duty of care which must be exercised by the motorist on a favored road.
  • Triche v. Commercial Union Insurance Company 329 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Clark v. Allstate Ins., Co., cited supra; , ; Fontenot v. Lucas, La.App., .
  • Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Finley 282 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Ryan v. Allstate Insurance Company of Chicago, 232 La.
  • Clark v. Allstate Insurance Company 279 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
  • Carter v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 278 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Ryan v. Allstate Insurance Company of Chicago, 232 La.
  • Banos v. Reed 271 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1972
  • Smith v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company 270 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
    144 , ; , ; Ryan v. Allstate Insurance Company, 232 La.
  • Sturcke v. Clark 261 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
    Ryan v. Allstate Insurance Company, 232 La.
  • Lacey v. Nettles 250 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    The rights of the motorist on a , at pages 909-910, , at page 851: ‘The law in this state is well settled that a motorist who is proceeding on a right-of-way street, upon approaching an intersection where traffic is required under a city ordinance, and is warned by stop signs, to come to a complete stop before entering the intersection
  • Rome v. S. D'ANTONI, INC. 246 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Ryan v. Allstate Insurance Company of Chicago, 232 La.
  • Decker v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. 247 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Meek v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 244 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc., supra; , (1948); Youngblood v. Robison, 239 La.
  • Dorty v. Zurich Insurance 236 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    250 , (1959); , (1948); Faulkner v. Ryder Tank Lines, Inc., supra.
  • Arnold v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 236 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    *586 “ , , where a stop sign was involved, the Court said: “ ‘ * * * The motorist on the right-of-way street, ivith knowledge of the location of such a stop sign, has a right to assume that any driver approaching the intersection from the less favored street will observe the lazo and bring his car to a comp
  • Billeaudeau v. Travelers Insurance Co. 232 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    (1948); Bourgeois v. Francois, 245 La.
  • Fontenot v. Lucas 228 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
  • Barthelemy v. Phoenix Insurance Co. 226 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    *606 , ; Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc., 209 La.
  • Guidry v. Covington 225 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    (1948); Bourgeois v. Francois, 245 La.
  • Ballaron v. Roth 221 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    831 , ; , ; Kientz v. Charles Dennery, 209 La.
  • Barrois v. Noto 215 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    The rights of the motorist on a , at page 909-910, , at page 851: "The law in this state is well settled that a motorist who is proceeding on a right-of-way street, upon approaching an intersection where traffic is required under a city ordinance, and is warned by stop signs, to come to a complete stop before entering the intersection
  • McCauley v. LaFleur 213 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    (1948); Bourgeois v. Francois, 245 La.
  • Richard v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 212 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
  • Richard v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 212 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Adams v. Kimble 208 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    is the law applicable to the situation in this lawsuit.
  • Valenti v. Courtney 206 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Ryan v. Allstate Insurance Company of Chicago, 232 La.
  • Valenti v. Courtney 206 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Ryan v. Allstate Insurance Company of Chicago, 232 La.
  • Ricardo v. American Indemnity Co. 201 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    (1948); Bourgeois v. Francois, 245 La.
  • Piquet v. Stiaes 198 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    (1948), and quotes therefrom as follows: “The law in this state is well settled that a motorist who is proceeding' on a right-of-way street, upon approaching an intersection where traffic is required under a city ordinance, and is warned by stop signs, to come to a complete stop before entering the inte
  • Guidry v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Company 193 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    (1948); Bourgeois v. Francois, 245 La.
  • Odom v. Foy 193 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    the Court stated the rule as follows: “The motorist on the right-of-way street, with knowledge of the location of such a stop sign, has a right to assume that any driver approaching the intersection from the less favored street will observe the law and bring his car to a complete stop before entering
  • Planchard v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 192 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    -910 , (1948), the Court said: “* * * The motorist on the right-of-way street, with knowledge of the location of such a stop sign, has a right to assume that any driver approaching the intersection from the less favored street will observe the law and bring his car to a complete stop before enter
  • Davis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 191 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
  • State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Merritt 185 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    Lavigne v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas.
  • Louisiana Fire Insurance v. Allstate Insurance Co. 186 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
  • Simms v. Sims 181 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    250 , : “ , , in resolving the respective duties and rights of motorists when approaching and entering intersections, very aptly stated that ‘the law in this state is well settled that a motorist who is proceeding on a right-of-way street, upon approaching an intersection where traffic is required under a city ordi
  • Reynolds v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. 178 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Walker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • Jolley v. Continental Southern Lines, Inc. 170 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
    "Since the `Transport' driver enjoyed the right of way at this permanently blind intersection, and was aware of the fact that the traffic on the intersecting highway was receiving a red flashing signal light, this Court exculpates him from blame, fault and negligence herein, , (1948) which reads: "`The motorist on the right-of-way street, with knowledge of the location of such a stop sign, has a right to assume that any driver approaching the intersection from the less favored street will observ
  • Breland v. American Insurance Company 163 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
  • Smith v. Insurance Co. of State of Pennsylvania 161 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Walker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins.
  • Lemon v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance 162 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    the Supreme Court laid down the principles which have been consistently followed in cases such as this.
  • Bourgeois v. Francois 161 So. 2d 750 La. 1964
    Ryan v. Allstate Insurance Company, 232 La.
  • Henderson v. Travelers Indemnity Company 158 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
    Ryan v. Allstate Insurance Company of Chicago, 232 La.
  • James v. State 154 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
  • Biggs v. Verbois 151 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    McCoy v. State Farm Mutual Ins.
  • Suhre v. National Union Indemnity Co. of Pennsylvania 152 So. 2d 558 La. 1963
    Henderson v. Central Mutual Insurance Company, 238 La.
  • Wise v. Prescott 151 So. 2d 356 La. 1963
    in which we stated: “ * * * The motorist on the right-of-way street, with knowledge of the location of such a stop sign, has a right to assume that any driver approaching the intersection from the less favored street will observe the law and bring his car to a complete stop before entering the interse
  • Patterson ex rel. Caraway v. Allstate Insurance Co. 147 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    The applicable law as to the duty of the driver on the . , as follows : “The law in this state is well settled that a motorist who is proceeding on a right-of-way street, upon approaching an intersection where traffic is required under a city ordinance, and is warned by stop signs, to come to a complete stop before entering the intersection, should not be held