DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Waterman v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co., 35 So. 2d 225.

58 citing documents.

  • Windward Land, LLC and Michael Morris Gulley versus Mary Lee Mann and William Lamont Frazier, Alvin Edwards and … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
  • Quantum Resources Management, L.L.C. v. Pirate Lake Oil Corp. 170 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Oil Co., , (1947) that property previously adjudicated to the State and not redeemed in time and manner provided by statute could not be assessed and sold by taxing officers as belonging to the former owner or any other person.
  • Quantum Resources Management, L.L.C. v. Pirate Lake Oil Corp. 112 So. 3d 209 La. 2013
    Oil Co., , (1947) (“[I]t is well established that, where property has been adjudicated to the State and not redeemed in time and manner provided by statute, the taxing officers of the State are without power to assess and sell the property as belonging to the former owner or any other person.”).
  • Loutre Land and Timber Co. v. Roberts 47 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
  • McClendon v. Thomas 768 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • Evans v. Waguespack 638 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Simmesport State Bank v. Roy 614 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • Riverlands Fleeting Corp. v. Milliken & Farwell, Inc. 515 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    River Lands’ , (1947) is ill-founded for their allegation.
  • River Lands Fleeting Corp. v. Ashland Plantation, Inc. 498 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    1974) , (1947) is ill-founded for their allegation.
  • Schexneider v. Villejoin 493 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    In support of this argument, , (1947) which holds that: “In order to establish the acquisitive prescription, plaintiffs are required to prove, in addition to good faith possession for the required time, that the deed under which they claim describes and identifies the land with clarity and that it is prima facie translative of the pr
  • Franks Petroleum, Inc. v. Mayo 438 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • Sabine Production Co. v. Guaranty Bank & Trust 432 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    Plaintiffs also urge the sale by the Savings and Loan was by quit-claim deed, and thus, , (1947); (La.App.
  • Freeman v. Turner 373 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
    (1947), the lower court found the 1936 deed to plaintiff's ancestor to be a quitclaim deed to which the after-acquired title doctrine did not apply.
  • Valvoline Oil Company v. Krauss 335 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
  • Fleckinger v. Smith 319 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    Oil Co., , (1947), the only Supreme Court cases cited in support of following McCarthy v. Gonnet , each involved a tax sale to a third party while the State was holding title to the property under an earlier adjudication.
  • Osborn v. Johnston 322 So. 2d 112 La. 1975
  • Montgomery v. Breaux 297 So. 2d 185 La. 1974
    881 (1938); , (1947); Collins v. Sun Oil Company, 223 La.
  • Scurlock Oil Company v. Getty Oil Company 294 So. 2d 810 La. 1974
    The meaning and effect of the language "release, relinquish and quitclaim all of its rights, title and interest" , (1947).
  • Wurzlow v. Placid Oil Company 279 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    166 (La.App.2nd Cir. 1931) , (1947).
  • Wilkie v. Cox 222 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    (La.App.3d Cir. 1961; , (1948); Neal v. Pitre, 142 La.
  • Cattle Farms, Inc. v. Abercrombie 211 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
    The original sale to Lacey conveyed interests in other townships in addition to T 21 S, R 31 E. The Lacey Claim, insofar as it concerns title to property in another township, , .
  • Robichaux v. Pool 209 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Pan American Production Co. v. Robichaux, 200 La.
  • Alexander v. Bates 192 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    782 ; , ; and Harrell v. Strumberg, 220 La.
  • Bolding v. Eason Oil Company 178 So. 2d 246 La. 1965
  • Johnston v. Nanney 155 So. 2d 196 La. 1963
    Boagni’s Heirs v. Thornton, La.App., ; Thomas v. Bomer-Blanks Lumber Co., La.App., ; , ; Johnson v. Chapman, La.App., 179 So.
  • Chauvin v. LeBlanc 148 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    149 , ; , ; Dugas v. Powell, 197 La.
  • Beatty v. Vining 147 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
  • Monk v. Monk 144 So. 2d 384 La. 1962
  • Simon v. Simon 138 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    35 So.2d *264 225 (1948), observed that a quitclaim deed conveys only such title or interest that the grantor had at the time it is given and “ ‘excludes any implication that he has any title or interest.’ 26 C.J.S.
  • Dupuy v. Shannon 136 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    881 ; Waterman v. Tidewater Associated Oil Company (1947), , ; Collins v. Sun Oil Company (1953), 223 La.
  • Newman v. McClure 134 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • Heirs of Boagni v. Thornton 132 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • Rycade Oil Corp. v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, ETC. 129 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
  • Sabourin v. Jilek 128 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1961
  • Bennett v. Hernandez 128 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    also Thomas v. Bomer-Blanks Lumber Co., La.App., .
  • Young v. Miller 125 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    881 ; , ; Collins v. Sun Oil Company, 223 La.
  • Boyet v. Perryman 123 So. 2d 79 La. 1960
  • Louisiana Canal Co. v. Leger 112 So. 2d 667 La. 1959
    881 ; , ; Collins v. Sun Oil Co., 223 La.
  • Fiedler v. Pipes 107 So. 2d 409 La. 1958
    and authorities there cited.
  • Taylor v. Williams 107 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    1094 , ; , ; Simmons v. Jones, La.App., ; Curry v. Henry, La.App., .
  • Wiggs v. Warren Realty Co. 106 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    811 , ; , ; Buckley v. Catlett, 203 La.
  • King v. Bickham 105 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
  • Thomas v. Bomer-Blanks Lumber Co. 105 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    Where property has been adjudicated to the state, and not redeemed in time and manner provided by the statute, the taxing officers of the state are without power to assess and sell said property as belonging to the former owner or any other person.” , is to the same effect.
  • Browder v. Roby 102 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    Such an instrument “ * * * is one which purports to convey, and is understood to convey, nothing more than the interest or estate in the property described of which grantor is seized or possessed, if any, at the time, rather than the property itself.” 26 C.J.S., verbo, Deeds § 8, which definition was affirmed in Waterman v. Tidewater Associated Oil Company, 1948, , .
  • Bel v. Manuel 99 So. 2d 58 La. 1958
  • James v. Le Blanc 95 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Estoppel § 10, p. 196, , .
  • Hall v. Bairfield 92 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Picou v. Curole, La.App.1950, ; Waterman v. Tidewater Associated Oil Company, 1947, , .
  • Koerber v. City of New Orleans 84 So. 2d 454 La. 1955
    54 , ; , ; Harrell v. Stumberg, 220 La.
  • Ducros v. Couret 82 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    Pan American Production Co. v. Robichaux, 200 La.
  • Richardson & Bass v. Board of Levee Commissioners 77 So. 2d 32 La. 1954
    A similar contention to that of the Levee Board, respecting its alleged in globo acquisition of the contested land, was advanced under a , .